Lie Detector Test Cost in Minnesota: 2026 Pricing

Our Minnesota Prices

LieDetectorTest.com has one polygraph testing office in Minnesota, in St Paul. A standard test — one person, one issue — is $550. That is the complete fee, not a starting point: the pre-test assessment, the examination itself, chart analysis, your same-day verbal result and your written report are all inside it.

You reserve an appointment with a $100 deposit. It comes off your total, and if we cannot offer you a suitable appointment — or your case turns out not to be suitable for polygraph testing — it is refunded in full. The initial consultation costs nothing, and nothing is added to the price afterwards.

Minnesota Price List

What the Fee Includes

• The pre-test assessment. A private interview in which your examiner reviews your case, agrees the exact wording of every question with you, and confirms you are suitable for testing.
• The examination itself. Multiple chart collections run by an examiner trained to APA standards, using validated APA techniques.
• Scoring and analysis. Numerical scoring of the charts after the test, not an on-the-spot impression.
• Your result on the day. Your examiner tells you the outcome verbally before you leave.
• A full written report within 48 hours, setting out the questions asked, the technique used and the conclusion.
• A private, appointment-only office. A controlled testing room — never a car park, a hotel lobby or your kitchen table unless you have specifically booked in-home testing.

What Changes the Price — and What Does Not

Which office you book is the main variable in Minnesota. Each office sets its own rate around local examiner availability, travel and venue costs, and the rate is fixed — you see the exact figure for your chosen office before you confirm anything.

How many people are tested is the second. Two people booked together as a couple test cost less than two standard tests, and a group of three or more moves to the per-person group rate automatically.

Whether one examination is enough is the third. A single test covers up to three relevant questions on one issue. If your case spans genuinely separate issues, it needs separate examinations, and each is charged as its own test. Your examiner will tell you at the consultation stage if that applies to you, before you have paid anything beyond the deposit.

What does not change the price is the subject matter. An infidelity test, a theft investigation, a false-allegation defence test and a pre-employment integrity test all cost the same at the same office. There is no surcharge for a sensitive subject, no separate charge for the written report, and no travel fee when you come to one of our offices.

Book a test in Minnesota → See every Minnesota office →

Components of a Quality Polygraph Examination

A comprehensive Minnesota polygraph examination should include several key components at no additional charge. The test itself typically takes approximately 90 minutes, though some more detailed examinations may require two to four hours [1]Verified Polygraph Exam Duration and Process
Confirms typical polygraph test duration of 2–4 hours including pre-test interview, chart collection, analysis, and written report. The entire process involves:

Pre-Test Interview: The examiner reviews the case, discusses the testing procedure, explains your rights, and develops the specific test questions with you. This critical phase establishes rapport and ensures the questions address the core issue [1]Verified Polygraph Exam Duration and Process
Confirms typical polygraph test duration of 2–4 hours including pre-test interview, chart collection, analysis, and written report.

Physiological Data Collection: The examiner attaches sensors measuring cardiovascular activity (blood pressure and heart rate), respiratory patterns (breathing rate and depth), and electrodermal activity (perspiration) while asking the series of questions.

Scoring and Analysis: Quality examiners use both hand-scoring and computerized scoring algorithms for maximum accuracy. The APA meta-analysis of 38 peer-reviewed studies found that single-issue diagnostic testing produces an aggregated decision accuracy of 89% (confidence interval 83%–95%) [2]Verified Polygraph Validity Research
Confirms APA meta-analysis finding 89% decision accuracy for single-issue testing and 85% for multi-issue, based on 38 studies[3]Verified Meta-Analytic Survey of Criterion Accuracy of Validated Polygraph Techniques
Confirms comprehensive meta-analysis methodology including 38 studies, 3,723 examinations, and 11,737 scored results.

Post-Test Discussion: After the data analysis, the examiner discusses the results with you and answers any questions.

Written Report: A detailed report documenting the process, methodology, findings, and professional opinion is provided, typically within 24 to 48 hours.

Always confirm that all of these components are included in the quoted price. If an examiner charges separately for the written report or computerized scoring, that is a red flag. Visit our polygraph test prices page for detailed national pricing information.

Location Within Minnesota

Polygraph pricing can vary significantly based on where in Minnesota you take the test. This mirrors the national trend where large metropolitan areas have higher prices compared to smaller cities.

Minnesota providers serve the entire state, with testing available in cities including Minneapolis, St. Paul, New Prague, Grand Rapids, Rochester, and Duluth. Visit our polygraph test locations page to find the nearest provider.

Examiner Credentials and Experience

An examiner's training, certifications, and professional reputation significantly influence pricing. Examiners with extensive backgrounds, advanced certifications, and full APA membership often charge higher rates — but they also deliver more reliable, well-documented results.

The APA recognizes two key membership levels. New examiners start as associate members, while full membership requires a minimum education threshold and over 100 quality-controlled examinations demonstrating expertise. When selecting an examiner in Minnesota, always verify they hold at least associate APA membership. You can learn more about examiner qualifications through the become a polygraph examiner section of our site.

Test Complexity and Purpose

The nature of the examination is one of the most important cost drivers. A straightforward single-issue test examining one specific allegation costs less than a multi-issue examination covering multiple topics[2]Verified Polygraph Validity Research
Confirms APA meta-analysis finding 89% decision accuracy for single-issue testing and 85% for multi-issue, based on 38 studies. APA research confirms that single-issue diagnostic testing achieves 89% decision accuracy, while multi-issue tests produce 85% accuracy (confidence interval 77%–93%) [2]Verified Polygraph Validity Research
Confirms APA meta-analysis finding 89% decision accuracy for single-issue testing and 85% for multi-issue, based on 38 studies[3]Verified Meta-Analytic Survey of Criterion Accuracy of Validated Polygraph Techniques
Confirms comprehensive meta-analysis methodology including 38 studies, 3,723 examinations, and 11,737 scored results. This is why many examiners recommend single-issue formats when possible — they deliver both better accuracy and lower cost.

Research by Van Bockstaele et al. (2012) demonstrated that lying involves measurable cognitive effort and that training effects do not generalize to unpracticed items, which underscores why well-crafted polygraph questions remain effective at detecting deception [4]Verified Learning to Lie: Effects of Practice on the Cognitive Cost of Lying
Confirms lying involves measurable cognitive effort and training effects do not generalize to unpracticed items.

No State License Required in Minnesota

Minnesota does not require a state license for polygraph examiners [5]Verified State Licensing Boards & Associations – APA
Confirms Minnesota has no state license required for polygraph examiners. This is confirmed by the APA's state licensing directory [5]Verified State Licensing Boards & Associations – APA
Confirms Minnesota has no state license required for polygraph examiners and by federal EPPA compliance resources [6]Verified Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) – Minnesota
Confirms Minnesota does not have state-level polygraph examiner requirements and examiners must meet federal 29 CFR 801.26 requirements. While this means there is lower regulatory overhead for examiners, it also means consumers must take extra care to verify their examiner's qualifications.

Due to the lack of licensing restrictions in Minnesota, there are unqualified individuals practicing who will take your money with little accountability. This makes it essential to verify APA membership directly through the APA website and to confirm MNPA membership. For comparison, see how states like California have structured their examiner licensing through our California CAPE guide.

The Role of the Minnesota Polygraph Association (MNPA)

The Minnesota Polygraph Association (MNPA) serves as the professional organization for polygraph examiners in the state [7]Verified MNPA Members – Minnesota Polygraph Association
Confirms MNPA is a professional organization providing training and best practices for polygraph examiners in Minnesota. The MNPA provides training, establishes best practices, and maintains professional resources for the continued growth of ethical, evidence-based polygraph practice [7]Verified MNPA Members – Minnesota Polygraph Association
Confirms MNPA is a professional organization providing training and best practices for polygraph examiners in Minnesota.

MNPA membership requires completion of a basic polygraph course at an APA-accredited school, plus membership in good standing with the APA, National Polygraph Association (NPA), or American Association of Police Polygraphists (AAPP) [8]Verified MNPA Membership Requirements
Confirms MNPA membership requires APA-accredited school completion and membership in APA, NPA, or AAPP. The MNPA establishes its own Standards of Practice, requiring member examiners to use evidence-based validated testing techniques supported by research conducted in accordance with APA research standards [9]Verified MNPA Standards of Practice
Confirms MNPA requires evidence-based validated testing techniques, 30 hours continuing education biannually, and specialized PCSOT training. Practicing MNPA members must complete a minimum of 30 continuing education hours every two years [9]Verified MNPA Standards of Practice
Confirms MNPA requires evidence-based validated testing techniques, 30 hours continuing education biannually, and specialized PCSOT training.

If you are taking a polygraph in Minnesota, your examiner should be an MNPA member for your own protection. The association serves as a watchdog against unqualified examiners.

Federal EPPA Requirements

Even though Minnesota has no state-level polygraph examiner licensing, the federal Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) of 1988 still applies [10]Verified Employee Polygraph Protection Act – Wikipedia
Confirms EPPA became law in 1988 and generally prevents private employers from using polygraph tests with government agency exemptions. The EPPA became effective on December 27, 1988, and generally prevents most private employers from using lie detector tests for pre-employment screening or during employment [10]Verified Employee Polygraph Protection Act – Wikipedia
Confirms EPPA became law in 1988 and generally prevents private employers from using polygraph tests with government agency exemptions[11]Verified Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 – 29 CFR Part 801
Confirms EPPA effective December 27, 1988, prohibiting most private employers from using lie detector tests. Federal, state, and local government employers are exempt from the EPPA [11]Verified Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 – 29 CFR Part 801
Confirms EPPA effective December 27, 1988, prohibiting most private employers from using lie detector tests.

Minnesota examiners must meet federal requirements at 29 CFR 801.26, which establishes baseline qualifications for any examiner conducting tests under EPPA-permitted circumstances [6]Verified Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) – Minnesota
Confirms Minnesota does not have state-level polygraph examiner requirements and examiners must meet federal 29 CFR 801.26 requirements. There is a $10,000 penalty for each violation of the EPPA [12]Verified Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) – APA Summary
Confirms $10,000 penalty per EPPA violation and examination requirements including minimum 90-minute duration. Understanding this federal framework is important context, similar to how New Jersey handles its polygraph requirements.

MN Statute §181.75: Employee Protection

Minnesota Statute §181.75 provides some of the strongest employee polygraph protections in the nation. The statute states: no employer or agent shall directly or indirectly solicit or require a polygraph, voice stress analysis, or any test purporting to test the honesty of any employee or prospective employee [13]Verified Minnesota Statute §181.75 – Polygraph Tests of Employees Prohibited
Confirms employer polygraph testing prohibition with misdemeanor criminal penalties and civil remedies including attorney's fees. This prohibition was first enacted in 1973 and strengthened by amendment in 1976 [14]Verified State by Spannaus v. Century Camera, Inc. (1981)
Confirms Minnesota employee polygraph protection law was first enacted in 1973 and upheld as constitutional.

Violations carry both criminal and civil penalties. An employer, agent, or any person knowingly selling, administering, or interpreting tests in violation of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor [13]Verified Minnesota Statute §181.75 – Polygraph Tests of Employees Prohibited
Confirms employer polygraph testing prohibition with misdemeanor criminal penalties and civil remedies including attorney's fees. Additionally, any person injured by a violation may bring a civil action to recover damages, including costs of investigation and reasonable attorney's fees [13]Verified Minnesota Statute §181.75 – Polygraph Tests of Employees Prohibited
Confirms employer polygraph testing prohibition with misdemeanor criminal penalties and civil remedies including attorney's fees.

The Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry is responsible for investigating suspected violations of §181.75 [13]Verified Minnesota Statute §181.75 – Polygraph Tests of Employees Prohibited
Confirms employer polygraph testing prohibition with misdemeanor criminal penalties and civil remedies including attorney's fees. If an employee voluntarily requests a polygraph test, the employer must inform the employee that taking the test is voluntary [13]Verified Minnesota Statute §181.75 – Polygraph Tests of Employees Prohibited
Confirms employer polygraph testing prohibition with misdemeanor criminal penalties and civil remedies including attorney's fees.

MN Statute §181.76: Disclosure Restrictions

Minnesota Statute §181.76 provides additional privacy protection by prohibiting any person from disclosing that another person has taken a polygraph or similar test, or the results of that test, except to the individual tested [15]Verified Minnesota Statute §181.76 – Disclosure of Lie Detector Tests Prohibited
Confirms disclosure of polygraph test results is prohibited except to the individual tested, with misdemeanor penalty. If the test was given at the employee's request after August 1, 1973, results may be shared only with persons authorized by the employee [15]Verified Minnesota Statute §181.76 – Disclosure of Lie Detector Tests Prohibited
Confirms disclosure of polygraph test results is prohibited except to the individual tested, with misdemeanor penalty. Violation of this disclosure restriction is also a misdemeanor [15]Verified Minnesota Statute §181.76 – Disclosure of Lie Detector Tests Prohibited
Confirms disclosure of polygraph test results is prohibited except to the individual tested, with misdemeanor penalty.

This means that in Minnesota, your polygraph examination and its results are protected by law from unauthorized disclosure — providing an extra layer of confidentiality beyond standard professional ethics.

Polygraph Admissibility in Minnesota Courts

Polygraph results are not admissible as evidence in Minnesota criminal or civil trials [16]Verified Results of Polygraph Test Not Admissible in Minnesota Probation-Revocation Proceedings
Confirms Minnesota courts hold polygraph results inadmissible in criminal trials, civil trials, and probation-revocation proceedings[17]Verified State v. Litzau (1985) – Minnesota Court of Appeals
Confirms Minnesota courts may not admit polygraph evidence under any circumstances, including by stipulation. Minnesota courts have consistently ruled that polygraph results and any reference to such tests are inadmissible at trial, even when both parties stipulate to their admissibility [17]Verified State v. Litzau (1985) – Minnesota Court of Appeals
Confirms Minnesota courts may not admit polygraph evidence under any circumstances, including by stipulation. The Minnesota Court of Appeals extended this precedent to probation-revocation proceedings, holding that polygraph results cannot be used as substantive evidence to prove a probation violation [16]Verified Results of Polygraph Test Not Admissible in Minnesota Probation-Revocation Proceedings
Confirms Minnesota courts hold polygraph results inadmissible in criminal trials, civil trials, and probation-revocation proceedings.

However, the courts specifically stated that this ruling does not limit the use of polygraph testing as a law enforcement investigative tool or as a condition of probation for treatment, therapy, monitoring, or evaluation [16]Verified Results of Polygraph Test Not Admissible in Minnesota Probation-Revocation Proceedings
Confirms Minnesota courts hold polygraph results inadmissible in criminal trials, civil trials, and probation-revocation proceedings. If an offender is required to take polygraph tests as a condition of probation, refusing to take the test can itself be evidence of a probation violation [16]Verified Results of Polygraph Test Not Admissible in Minnesota Probation-Revocation Proceedings
Confirms Minnesota courts hold polygraph results inadmissible in criminal trials, civil trials, and probation-revocation proceedings. Federal courts have also recognized that polygraph examinations further the goals of probation by encouraging truthfulness and compliance [18]Verified Polygraphs and Treatment Courts
Confirms federal courts recognize polygraph examinations as furthering goals of probation by encouraging truthfulness.

MN Statute §609.3456: Sex Offender Polygraph Testing

Minnesota Statute §609.3456 specifically authorizes the use of polygraph testing for sex offenders on probation or conditional release [19]Verified Minnesota Statute §609.3456 – Use of Polygraphs for Sex Offenders
Confirms statutory authority for court-ordered polygraph testing of sex offenders and fee waiver provisions for indigent offenders. Under this statute, a court may order polygraph examinations as an intermediate sanction, and the Commissioner of Corrections may order them as a condition of release [19]Verified Minnesota Statute §609.3456 – Use of Polygraphs for Sex Offenders
Confirms statutory authority for court-ordered polygraph testing of sex offenders and fee waiver provisions for indigent offenders[20]Verified MN Polygraph Sex Offender Law – Minneapolis Attorney
Confirms §609.3456 authorizes courts and Commissioner of Corrections to mandate polygraph examinations for sex offenders.

The court or commissioner may order the offender to pay all or a portion of the examination costs, but the fee may be waived if the offender is indigent or if payment would create economic hardship for the offender's immediate family [19]Verified Minnesota Statute §609.3456 – Use of Polygraphs for Sex Offenders
Confirms statutory authority for court-ordered polygraph testing of sex offenders and fee waiver provisions for indigent offenders. This statute applies statewide across all Minnesota counties [21]Verified Minnesota Polygraph Order Lawyer – §609.3456 Statewide
Confirms §609.3456 applies statewide across all Minnesota counties with fee waiver for indigency.

NIJ-funded research has documented the significant value of the post-conviction polygraph as part of a comprehensive containment approach for sex offender management [22]Verified Value of Polygraph Testing in Sex Offender Management
Confirms NIJ-funded research documenting the value of polygraph as part of comprehensive containment approach for sex offender management. Agencies using polygraph testing were found to have better supervision outcomes, enhanced disclosure, and improved knowledge of offender behavior patterns [22]Verified Value of Polygraph Testing in Sex Offender Management
Confirms NIJ-funded research documenting the value of polygraph as part of comprehensive containment approach for sex offender management[23]Verified Polygraph Plays a Key Role as Containment Tool for Sex Offenders
Confirms polygraph benefits in sex offender management including enhanced disclosure and improved supervision outcomes. MNPA standards require that examiners conducting PCSOT testing complete at least 40 hours of specialized training and devote at least half of their required continuing education to sex offender-related topics [9]Verified MNPA Standards of Practice
Confirms MNPA requires evidence-based validated testing techniques, 30 hours continuing education biannually, and specialized PCSOT training. For information on how polygraph testing supports healthcare screening programs, see our dedicated guide.

Private and Personal Matters

Polygraph testing in Minnesota is widely used for personal matters where trust and resolution are paramount. Common personal uses include:

Our guide on whether polygraph can detect emotional abuse provides additional context on relationship-focused testing.

Theft allegations within families or social circles, where a polygraph can help identify the responsible party or clear the innocent.

Child abuse investigations, where concerned parents or guardians seek to verify claims.

Addiction monitoring programs covering issues such as adultery, masturbation, and pornography (AMP screening).

Background verification for personal purposes, such as confirming a prospective partner's history.

Legal and Criminal Defense Applications

While polygraph results are not admissible in Minnesota courts, attorneys across Minneapolis and St. Paul regularly use polygraph testing as a strategic tool in case preparation. A favorable polygraph result can influence prosecutorial decisions, support plea negotiations, or demonstrate a client's cooperation and truthfulness to stakeholders.

Attorneys considering the use of polygraph in defense strategies may benefit from understanding how other jurisdictions approach similar issues. For example, our guide to polygraph after DUI accusations illustrates how polygraph can support defense planning. Research has highlighted the importance of proper examination procedures, including a landmark study by Shurany (2010) that demonstrated how mental countermeasures can be successfully detected through proper polygraph protocols [24]Verified Confirmed Mental Countermeasure Case in Costa Rica
Confirms mental countermeasures can be successfully detected through proper polygraph examination procedures.

Law Enforcement and Government Use

Federal, state, and local government agencies in Minnesota are exempt from both the EPPA and MN §181.75 employee testing restrictions [10]Verified Employee Polygraph Protection Act – Wikipedia
Confirms EPPA became law in 1988 and generally prevents private employers from using polygraph tests with government agency exemptions[13]Verified Minnesota Statute §181.75 – Polygraph Tests of Employees Prohibited
Confirms employer polygraph testing prohibition with misdemeanor criminal penalties and civil remedies including attorney's fees. Law enforcement agencies throughout the state use polygraph testing for internal investigations, pre-employment screening, and criminal investigations.

Minnesota's sex offender treatment programs reference APA standards extensively. Minnesota Rules Chapter 2955 requires that polygraph examiners conducting PCSOT testing follow the APA's Model Policy for Post-Conviction Sex Offender Testing (September 2021) and the APA Standards of Practice (2024) [25]Verified Minnesota Rules Chapter 2955 – Sex Offender Treatment Standards
Confirms Minnesota sex offender treatment standards reference APA Standards of Practice (2024) and Model Policy for PCSOT. This ensures a high standard of professional practice for court-ordered testing throughout the state. For insight into how law enforcement polygraph programs work in other states, see our guides on Nevada law enforcement hiring and Tennessee's TBI polygraph program.

Essential Credential Checks

Because Minnesota has no state licensing requirement [5]Verified State Licensing Boards & Associations – APA
Confirms Minnesota has no state license required for polygraph examiners, verifying your examiner's qualifications is especially important. Follow these steps to ensure you are working with a qualified professional:

Verify APA Membership: Check the APA's online member directory to confirm the examiner holds current membership. Full APA membership requires completion of an APA-accredited training program and over 100 quality-controlled examinations. Associate membership is the entry level for newer examiners.

Confirm MNPA Membership: The Minnesota Polygraph Association validates that examiners have met minimum requirements to practice in Minnesota [8]Verified MNPA Membership Requirements
Confirms MNPA membership requires APA-accredited school completion and membership in APA, NPA, or AAPP. MNPA membership requires completion of a basic polygraph course at an APA-accredited school, plus active membership in the APA, NPA, or AAPP [8]Verified MNPA Membership Requirements
Confirms MNPA membership requires APA-accredited school completion and membership in APA, NPA, or AAPP.

Ask About Specialization: For specific test types — particularly infidelity, PCSOT, or legal matters — ask whether the examiner has specialized training and experience in that area. PCSOT examiners must have a minimum of 40 additional hours of specialized training beyond basic polygraph school [9]Verified MNPA Standards of Practice
Confirms MNPA requires evidence-based validated testing techniques, 30 hours continuing education biannually, and specialized PCSOT training.

To learn more about what goes into proper examiner training and certification, visit our polygraph training page.

Red Flags to Watch For

Be cautious of examiners who exhibit any of the following warning signs:

Pricing significantly below $300 for a standard exam — this often indicates inadequate training, expired certifications, or a fraudulent operation.

Guaranteeing specific results before testing — no legitimate examiner can predict or promise the outcome of a polygraph examination.

Using pressure tactics to get you to book immediately — quality examiners provide a free confidential consultation and answer your questions patiently.

Refusing to verify credentials — legitimate professionals readily display their APA membership and allow you to verify it independently.

For more detailed information about identifying deceptive polygraph practices, read our California polygraph scam warning guide, which outlines red flags applicable nationwide. Research underscores the importance of proper examination integrity: a study documented in The Norfolk Four case revealed the devastating consequences that can occur when interrogation integrity is compromised, including wrongful convictions resulting from false confessions [26]Verified 5 Costs and Consequences of Deception, Coercion, and False Confessions: The Norfolk Four
Documents devastating consequences of interrogation integrity failures including wrongful convictions from false confessions.

How to Schedule Your Examination

Booking a professional polygraph test in Minnesota is straightforward. Begin by contacting us for a free, confidential consultation to discuss your situation. This initial conversation helps us understand your needs and develop the most effective testing approach. Our experienced examiners take a genuine interest in every case and may refer you to additional services if needed.

We offer professional polygraph testing at our St. Paul location, starting from $550. All examinations are conducted by examiners trained to APA standards using validated testing techniques. Results are typically available within 24 to 48 hours.

For scheduling, visit our booking page or contact us directly. You can also find all available Minnesota testing locations on our locations page.

Preparing for Your Minnesota Polygraph Test

Proper preparation helps ensure accurate results and a smooth testing experience. Here are essential preparation tips:

Get adequate sleep the night before your examination. Fatigue can affect physiological responses.

Use all prescribed medications as directed by your doctor — do not skip or alter medications before the test.

Avoid alcohol and recreational drugs within 24 hours of the examination.

Wear comfortable clothing and plan to arrive early to settle in.

The examination room should be private, quiet, and temperature-controlled to ensure optimal testing conditions. Our testing facilities meet or exceed these professional standards.

Research has shown that polygraph procedures can be effectively adapted to accommodate various needs. A study by Shurany and Chaves (2013) documented successful approaches for adapting polygraph procedures for examinees with hearing and speech disabilities, demonstrating the flexibility of professional polygraph practice [27]Verified Testing a Deaf Mute Examinee in Costa Rica
Documents practical approaches for adapting polygraph procedures to accommodate examinees with hearing and speech disabilities. Compare our Minnesota pricing with other states through our guides for Texas, Utah, and Louisiana.

Confidentiality in Minnesota

When conducted by a private examiner, your Minnesota polygraph examination is highly confidential. Minnesota Statute §181.76 prohibits disclosure that a person has taken a polygraph or the test results, except to the individual tested [15]Verified Minnesota Statute §181.76 – Disclosure of Lie Detector Tests Prohibited
Confirms disclosure of polygraph test results is prohibited except to the individual tested, with misdemeanor penalty. Private polygraph examiners are generally not mandated reporters, meaning all admissions and inquiries during your examination remain strictly confidential. Always confirm your examiner's mandated reporter status before the examination.

This legal protection, combined with professional ethics standards enforced by the APA and MNPA, means you can approach your examination with confidence that your privacy will be maintained.