Professional Examiners Trained to APA Standards
140+ Professional Testing Locations Across the U.S. & Canada
Trusted by 10,000+ Clients, Attorneys & Organizations
LieDetectorTest.com Private & Confidential Polygraph Provider

Home › Polygraph Research › Systematic Review

Subject index

Systematic Review

This topic encompasses 69 peer-reviewed studies, primarily in the field of meta-analyses & systematic reviews. Research in this area spans from the 1970s to the 2020s.

69Studies
1970s–2020sSpan
8Categories
123Researchers

Research categories

Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews · 42 Government Scientific Reviews · 9 Neuroimaging & New Technologies · 6 AI & Machine Learning in Deception Detection · 5 Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection · 4 Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection (statement analysis, CBCA, verbal cues, non-verbal behavior, interview techniques, linguistic analysis) · 1 Legal & Policy Studies · 1 Sex Offender Management (PCSOT) · 1

Key researchers

Studies tagged “Systematic Review” [69]

All 69 peer-reviewed studies in this research area, sorted by year.

[001] Bewar Neamat Taha, Muhammet Baykara, Talha Burak Alakuş (2025)

Neurophysiological Approaches to Lie Detection: A Systematic Review

Brain Sciences The Concealed Information Test with P300 was the most frequently employed protocol. Bandpass filtering and Discrete Wavelet Transform emerged as preferred preprocessing and feature extraction… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[002] Febryan Cahya Permana, Sunu Wibirama, Noor Akhmad Setiawan (2025)

A Review on Robustness of Deception Detection System Based on Eye Movement Features

2025 11th International HCI and UX Conference in Indonesia (CHIuXiD) Most eye movement-based deception detection systems achieved only low to medium robustness scores. Multimodal approaches demonstrated higher robustness than unimodal approaches, but challenges including limited… Neuroimaging & New Technologies
[003] Eduardo Pérez-Campos Mayoral; Mark Severino; Eduardo Lorenzo Pérez-Campos (2025)

Investigative Interviewing: Priming the Interview Context

European Polygraph The paper identifies a significant gap in empirical evidence supporting priming effectiveness in real-world forensic contexts, despite its intuitive appeal and extensive laboratory validation. Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[004] Michał Widacki; John J. Palmatier (2025)

Memory Distortions, Confabulation, and Their Impact on Polygraph Examinations

European Polygraph Confabulated memories can produce autonomic responses similar to genuine memories, creating false-positive polygraph results because traditional methods cannot distinguish between intentional deception and genuinely believed… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[005] Debanil Chanda, R. K. Mandal (2025)

A Comprehensive Review and Future Prospects of Lie Detection Using Machine Learning

Communications in Computer and Information Science Full text not accessible; unable to extract specific findings from the review. Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[006] Invictus Polygraph (2025)

The Ocular Motor Deception Test (ODT): A Critical Review of Scientific Validity, Legal Risk, and Operational Readiness

Invictus Polygraph (White Paper) The review identifies significant concerns about ODT's foundational assumptions, noting that physiological markers like pupil dilation primarily reflect general cognitive processes rather than deception-specific states. Neuroimaging & New Technologies
[007] Giuseppe Manuel Festa; Iginio Sisto Lancia (2025)

Neuroscientific and Biometric Methodologies in Forensic Contexts: A Critical Review

Psychology and Behavioral Sciences The review provides evidence-based evaluation of cutting-edge forensic tools including fMRI, ERP, brain fingerprinting, and machine learning techniques that may complement or supplement traditional investigative… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[008] Shanjita Akter Prome (2024)

Deception detection using machine learning and deep learning techniques: A systematic review

Natural Language Processing Journal The review identifies that human deception detection accuracy remains at only 54%, barely better than chance, while modern facial expression-based ML systems offer non-intrusive, cost-effective… AI & Machine Learning in Deception Detection
[009] Hugues Delmas, Vincent Denault, Judee K. Burgoon, Norah E. Dunbar (2024)

A Review of Automatic Lie Detection from Facial Features

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Automated facial lie detection systems achieve average accuracy of 61.87% to 72.93% depending on classifier type, based on average datasets of 52 individuals. Most studies… AI & Machine Learning in Deception Detection
[010] Alex Sebastião Constâncio; Denise Fukumi Tsunoda; Helena de Fátima Nunes Silva; Jocelaine Martins da Silveira; Deborah Ribeiro Carvalho (2023)

Deception detection with machine learning: A systematic review and statistical analysis

PLoS ONE Of 81 reviewed studies, detection accuracy ranged from 51% to 100%, with 19 works achieving above 90% accuracy. Monomodal approaches constituted 40.74% of studies, though… AI & Machine Learning in Deception Detection
[011] Wasiq Khan; Keeley Crockett; Abir Jaafar Hussain (2023)

Intelligent Eye-Tracker-Based Methods for Detection of Deception: A Survey

MDPI Journals Eye-tracking methods show promise as a contactless, non-invasive alternative to conventional polygraph examinations, with potential applications in mass-screening scenarios like airport security and pre-employment procedures. Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[012] Wasiq Khan (2023)

Intelligent techniques for deception detection: a survey and critical study

Soft Computing Machine learning and deep learning methods have demonstrated significant effectiveness in deception detection across multiple modalities, though current datasets lack diversity and ecological validity, being… AI & Machine Learning in Deception Detection
[013] Valentin Foucher (2023)

Using Eye Tracking to detect Faking Intentions

Proceedings of the 2023 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications Fixation number and duration emerge as the most reliable indicators of deceptive intentions, while saccade amplitudes and pupil size show promising potential but require further… Neuroimaging & New Technologies
[014] Daniel Rad; Nicoleta Paraschiv; Csaba Kiss (2023)

Neural network applications in polygraph scoring — A scoping review

MDPI Journals Neural networks, particularly feedforward and convolutional architectures, show promise in improving polygraph accuracy over traditional methods, though further validation research is needed to determine optimal… AI & Machine Learning in Deception Detection
[015] Ronald Philip Fisher (2022)

Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future

Brain Sciences Active interviewing protocols showed superior performance, with Cognitive Credibility Assessment achieving 60% accuracy versus 48% without it, and Reality Interviewing correctly classifying approximately 75% of… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[016] Sarah Volz, Marc‐André Reinhard, Patrick Müller (2022)

The confidence‐accuracy relation – A comparison of metacognition measures in lie detection

Applied Cognitive Psychology Regardless of analytical measure used, none of the 12 studies demonstrated a confidence-accuracy relationship, indicating people lack metacognitive insight into the quality of their veracity… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[017] Rupinder Saini, Pooja Rani (2022)

LDM: A Systematic Review on Lie detection Methodologies

The review identified a clear evolution from traditional contact-based polygraph methods to machine learning-driven contactless approaches utilizing facial micro-expressions, thermal imaging, and voice analysis, with… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[018] Nelson, R., Handler, M., Raskin, D.C. (2021)

Literature Review and Analysis of the Multi-facet Hypothesis and the Evaluation of Independent Target Questions

Polygraph & Forensic Credibility Assessment Grand total scoring achieved 89% accuracy compared to 78% for multi-facet hypothesis scoring—an 11 percentage point difference that challenges the operational utility of assuming independence… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[019] Delgado-Herrera, M., Reyes-Aguilar, A., Giordano, M. (2021)

What deception tasks used in the lab really do: systematic review and meta-analysis of ecological validity of fMRI deception tasks

Neuroscience Intention to lie was the least frequently included component in fMRI deception studies. Tasks with high ecological validity recruited fewer brain regions (bilateral ACC and… Neuroimaging & New Technologies
[020] Wang Li, Zhou Aibao (2020)

Analysis of Knowledge Graph of Polygraph Research at Home and Abroad Based on CiteSpace

Criminal Justice Science & Governance The study reveals growth in polygraph research output, identification of major research hotspots including CIT and countermeasures, divergent research priorities between Chinese and Western researchers,… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[021] Donnie W. Dutton (2019)

Literature Survey of Structural Weighting of Polygraph Signals

Polygraph & Forensic Credibility Assessment EDA contributes over 60% of diagnostic information in polygraph testing, with cardiovascular responses accounting for approximately 34% and respiration contributing the remainder. Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[022] Vrij, A., Hartwig, M., Granhag, P.A. (2019)

Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception

Annual Review of Psychology Only 14 of 50 nonverbal cues (28%) showed significant relationships with deception, with effect sizes typically small (largest d = -0.55). People achieve only 54%… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[023] Elizabeth Elliott; Birgit Angela Völlm (2018)

A systematic review of the effectiveness of the polygraph in post-conviction sex offender testing and monitoring

Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health The review found fragmented and methodologically inconsistent evidence for polygraph effectiveness in sex offender management, with no randomized controlled trials identified across the literature. Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[024] Elizabeth Elliott; Birgit Angela Völlm (2018)

A systematic review of polygraph testing in post-conviction sex offender management

Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health The review found fragmented and largely anecdotal empirical support for PCSOT, with no randomized controlled trials identified among the studies examined. Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[025] Elliott, E., Vollm, B. (2018)

The utility of post-conviction polygraph (PCSOT) in the treatment and management of sexual offenders

Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment PCSOT significantly increased relevant disclosures across all studies but showed no impact on sexual recidivism, with some evidence of reduced violent (non-sexual) reoffending. Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[026] Elizabeth Elliott; Birgit Angela Völlm (2018 • SYSTEMATIC REVIEW)

The Utility of Post-Conviction Polygraph Testing Among Sexual Offenders

Sexual Abuse Systematic review of 19 studies from the US, UK, and Netherlands. All established PCSOT elicits significant increases in risk-relevant disclosures. Impact on reoffending was significant… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[027] Iacono, W. G., Ben-Shakhar, G. (2018)

Current status of forensic lie detection with the comparison question technique: An update of the 2003 National Academy of Sciences report on polygraph testing

Law and Human Behavior Research quality has not improved in the 15 years since the NAS report, and fundamental problems with CQT validation—weak theoretical foundations, poor study quality, and… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[028] Jacobsen, C., Fosgaard, T.R., Pascual-Ezama, D. (2018)

Why do we lie? A practical guide to the dishonesty literature

Journal of Economic Surveys Dishonesty is highly malleable and context-dependent rather than a stable trait, with most people cheating "just a little" to maintain positive self-image while being sensitive… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[029] Zarah Vernham, Pär-Anders Granhag, Erik Mac Giolla (2016)

Corrigendum: Detecting Deception within Small Groups: A Literature Review

Frontiers in Psychology Truth-telling groups exhibit significantly more interactive and communicative behaviors during collective interviews compared to lying groups, who lack shared transactive memory and merely repeat rehearsed… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[030] Ewout H. Meijer; Bruno J. Verschuere; Matthias Gamer; Harald L. Merckelbach; Gershon Ben-Shakhar (2016)

Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty

Psychophysiology The review identified significant conceptual clarity issues and methodological problems across deception detection paradigms, particularly challenging the oversold promises of neuroimaging-based lie detection technologies. Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[031] Daniel D. Langleben (2016)

Review of fMRI Studies on Lie Detection (16 Studies)

Various Publications Review of 16 empirical studies using fMRI for deception detection. Found that inconsistency between findings and absence of replications make fMRI not yet scientifically reliable… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[032] Victoria L. Rubin (2016)

Deception Detection and Rumor Debunking for Social Media

The SAGE Handbook of Social Media Research Methods Human deception detection achieves only 50-63% accuracy without technological assistance. Automated machine learning approaches reach approximately 65% accuracy, with hybrid methods combining linguistic analysis and… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection (statement analysis, CBCA, verbal cues, non-verbal behavior, interview techniques, linguistic analysis)
[033] Marcin Gołaszewski; Paweł Zając; Jan Stefan Widacki (2015)

Thermal Vision as a Method of Detection of Deception: A Review of Experiences

European Polygraph The periorbital and nasal regions showed the highest temperature fluctuations associated with deception, with studies reporting 73.3% accuracy for thermal imaging alone and improved results… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[034] Raymond Nelson (2015)

Scientific basis for polygraph testing

Polygraph The review demonstrates that modern polygraph practice is based on sophisticated models involving differential salience and signal detection theory rather than older fear-based explanations, establishing… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[035] Ewout H. Meijer; Bruno J. Verschuere (2015)

The polygraph: Current practice and new approaches

In Granhag et al. (Eds.), Detecting Deception The review highlighted ongoing debates about polygraph accuracy and identified the Concealed Information Test as a potentially more scientifically sound alternative to traditional Control Question… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[036] Jennifer M. C. Vendemia (2014)

fMRI as a Method of Detection of Deception: A Review of Experiences

European Polygraph The review provided a critical assessment of fMRI's capabilities for deception detection, highlighting methodological challenges and the gap between laboratory findings and real-world applications at… Neuroimaging & New Technologies
[037] Karolina Dukała; Romuald Polczyk (2014)

Value of Content-Based Deception Detection Methods

European Polygraph The review identified that accuracy rates can vary significantly based on calculation methods and that subjective weighting of criteria by coders impacts reliability more than… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[038] Raskin, D.C., Honts, C.R., Kircher, J.C. (2014)

Credibility Assessment: Scientific Research and Applications

Elsevier Academic Press Polygraph test accuracy is estimated at approximately 89% for specific-incident criminal investigations and 85% for screening applications. Electrodermal reactions are the most diagnostic psychophysiological measure,… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[039] Ioannou, S., Gallese, V., Merla, A. (2014)

Thermal infrared imaging in psychophysiology: Potentialities and limits

Psychophysiology Thermal imaging showed extremely high correlations with traditional measures (r = 0.968 with finger GSR, r = 0.943 with perinasal GSR) and demonstrated validity for… Neuroimaging & New Technologies
[040] Tuvya T. Amsel (2013)

Comparative Review of Polygraph and Other Diagnostic Tools and Methods

European Polygraph Polygraph diagnostic accuracy (.88) was comparable to established medical imaging technologies including MRI, CT scan, and ultrasound. Inter-rater reliability among polygraph examiners (.77) exceeded physicians… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[041] Donald J. Krapohl (2013)

Polygraph Principles: A Literature Review

Polygraph Comprehensive review of the scientific principles underlying modern polygraph testing, including signal detection theory, test data analysis methods, and statistical foundations. Served as a reference… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[042] Gershon Ben-Shakhar (2012 • SYSTEMATIC REVIEW)

Current Research and Potential Applications of the Concealed Information Test: An Overview

Frontiers Journals Comprehensive overview of CIT research highlighting its strong theoretical foundation in orienting response theory. Noted that CIT's false positive rate remains extremely low (~5%) across… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[043] Pamela K. Shaw (2012)

The Empirical Basis for the Use of Directed Lie Comparison Questions in Diagnostic and Screening Polygraphs

APA Magazine The review found little to no meaningful difference in effect size or detection accuracy between directed lie and probable lie comparison questions, supporting the scientific… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[044] Marcin Gołaszewski (2012)

Validated Techniques and Scoring Models for PDD Test Data Analysis – Conclusions from the 2011 APA Report

European Polygraph The 2011 APA meta-analysis established new mandatory standards requiring only scientifically validated techniques, effectively ending the era when tradition or personal preference alone could justify… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[045] Leo, R.A. (2009)

False Confessions: Causes, Consequences, and Implications

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Three sequential errors—misclassification of innocence, guilt-presumptive accusatory interrogation with deception and coercion, and contamination through postadmission narrative shaping—systematically produce false confessions. Confession evidence is uniquely… Legal & Policy Studies
[046] (2008)

Cultural Differences in Credibility Assessment

Paper to Digital Cross-cultural deception detection accuracy deteriorates significantly, with eight specific cultural norms identified that create systematic biases including gaze aversion patterns, storytelling styles, and linguistic cue… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[047] Ewout H. Meijer; Bruno J. Verschuere; Harald L. Merckelbach; Geert Crombez (2008)

Sex Offender Management Using the Polygraph: A Critical Review

International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31(5), 423–429 Critical evaluation of PCSOT effectiveness. Acknowledged that PCSOT reliably elicits increased disclosures but questioned whether increased disclosure translates to reduced recidivism. Called the polygraph an… Sex Offender Management (PCSOT)
[048] Gannon, T.A., Beech, A.R., Ward, T. (2008)

Does the polygraph lead to better risk prediction for sexual offenders?

Aggression and Violent Behavior The review concluded there is reasonable evidence for polygraph use in some risk assessment areas, particularly for eliciting disclosures of historical and acute-dynamic risk factors,… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[049] Vrij, A. (2008)

Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities

Interpersonal Communication Most widely-believed deception cues are unreliable, with 75% of examined cues showing no association with deception. Human lie-truth discrimination averages 54% accuracy, while Control Question… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[050] Masip, J., Sporer, S.L., Garrido, E., Herrero, C. (2005)

The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence

Psychology, Crime & Law Individual RM criteria showed inconsistent performance across studies, with temporal and spatial details demonstrating stronger discriminative power than criteria such as cognitive operations and clarity/vividness.… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[051] British Psychological Society Working Party (2004)

A Review of the Current Scientific Status and Fields of Application of Polygraphic Deception Detection

BPS Report (26/05/04) Official UK scientific assessment by the British Psychological Society. Reviewed the evidence base across multiple polygraph applications and provided recommendations for potential UK adoption, laying… Government Scientific Reviews
[052] Blair, J. P., Kooi, B. (2004)

The gap between training and research in the detection of deception

International Journal of Police Science and Management The paper concluded that research provides only limited support for the Reid Technique's nonverbal behavior model, with many purported deception cues showing weak or no… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[053] American Polygraph Association (2004)

Efficacy of Detecting Deception in Psychopaths Using a Polygraph

Polygraph The review addressed a critical gap in understanding psychopaths' susceptibility to polygraph testing despite theoretical concerns about their reduced emotional reactivity and lack of anxiety. Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[054] National Research Council; National Academy of Sciences (2003 • LANDMARK GOVERNMENT REVIEW)

The Polygraph and Lie Detection

Government & Policy Documents The most comprehensive government review ever conducted. Examined approximately 80 research studies. Concluded that specific-incident polygraph tests “can discriminate lying from truth telling at rates… Government Scientific Reviews
[055] Gregory DeClue (2003)

Book Section: Essay and Review: The Polygraph and Lie Detection

The Journal of Psychiatry & Law The NRC concluded that specific-incident polygraph tests perform above chance but well below perfection, with accuracy for security screening insufficient to justify reliance in federal… Government Scientific Reviews
[056] National Research Council (2003 • NRC ASSESSMENT)

Countermeasures Assessment (NRC Chapter 6)

The Polygraph and Lie Detection, National Academies Press, Ch. 6 NRC concluded “countermeasures pose a serious threat” because all physiological indicators can be altered by conscious effort. However, noted limited evidence on countermeasure effectiveness in… Government Scientific Reviews
[057] Alan P. Zelicoff (2003)

Positive and Negative Predictive Values of Polygraphs: Results from published field studies

Sandia National Laboratories Analysis of field study data reveals limitations in polygraph predictive values when applied to populations with low base rates of deception. Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[058] Fiedler, K., Schmid, J., & Stahl, T. (2002)

What is the current truth about polygraph lie detection?

Basic and Applied Social Psychology The CQT meets only one of five core validity criteria (coding objectivity). Published evidence does not allow item analysis, the decision model remains unspecified, predictive… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[059] Crewson, P. E. (2001)

A comparative analysis of polygraph with other screening and diagnostic tools

Department of Defense Polygraph Institute, Research Support Service For field screening, polygraph demonstrated sensitivity of .59 and specificity of .92, with inter-rater reliability (kappa = .77) exceeding physicians (.56) and nearly matching psychologists… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[060] William George Iacono (2001)

Forensic 'Lie Detection': Procedures Without Scientific Basis

Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice Studies published in top scientific journals indicated that approximately 43% of innocent subjects fail the CQT polygraph test. Surveys of relevant scientific experts found that… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[061] Vrij, A. (2000)

Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and implications for professional practice

John Wiley & Sons Certain verbal characteristics (shorter responses, fewer self-references, indirect replies) are more consistently present in lies than honest accounts, but popular beliefs about how liars behave… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[062] Shinji Hira (1998)

Detection of deception with event-related brain potentials

Japanese Journal of Science and Technology for Identification The P3 (P300) component was identified as the most viable ERP-based detection index due to its large amplitude, ease of recording, and slightly superior correct… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[063] Forensic Research Incorporated (commissioned by APA (1997 • APA COMMISSIONED REVIEW)

Review of 12 Field Validity Studies of CQT

American Polygraph Association APA-commissioned review of 12 field validity studies conducted since 1980, concluding that CQT accuracy in real-life applications ranged from 92%–98%. This review was later cited… Government Scientific Reviews
[064] David C. Raskin (1986 • SCIENTIFIC STATUS)

The Scientific Status of Research on Polygraph Techniques: The Case for Polygraph Tests

In Faigman et al. (Eds.), Modern Scientific Evidence Major chapter presenting the scientific case for polygraph validity. Reviewed controlled studies showing accuracy above 90% and argued polygraph meets evidentiary standards. Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[065] Theodore P. Cross (1985)

The Validity of Polygraph Testing: Scientific Analysis and Public Controversy

American Psychologist The review found serious problems with both the theoretical basis and evidentiary quality supporting polygraph validity, and concluded that reported high accuracy rates were not… Government Scientific Reviews
[066] Office of Technology Assessment; United States Congress (1983 • CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW)

Scientific Validity of Polygraph Testing: A Research Review and Evaluation

Government & Policy Documents Systematic review for Congress. Analyzed 10 field studies and 14 analog studies using the CQT. Found laboratory studies had an average unweighted accuracy of .83… Government Scientific Reviews
[067] Gordon H. Barland; David C. Raskin; Philip J. Bersh; P. O. Davidson; Frank S. Horvath; Frank S. Horvath; John E. Reid; Frank Hunter; Philip Ash; Benjamin Kleinmuntz; Julian J. Szucko; David C. Raskin; Stanley M. Slowik; Joseph P. Buckley; Douglas Edward Wicklander; Frank Hunter (IDENTIFIED BY OTA (1983) • 10 KEY FIELD STUDIES)

OTA-Qualifying Field Studies of CQT Validity

Various journals (1960s–1980s) The 10 field studies identified by the Office of Technology Assessment as meeting minimum scientific standards. Together, they showed: false positive rates ranging from 0–75%… Government Scientific Reviews
[068] Saxe, L., Dougherty, D., Cross, T.P. (1983)

The scientific validity of polygraph testing

Office of Technology Assessment Report Field studies showed average guilty detection of 86.3% but innocent detection of only 76%, with false positive rates averaging 19.1%. No scientific validity was established… Government Scientific Reviews
[069] John A. Podlesny (1977)

Physiological Measures and the Detection of Deception

Psychological Bulletin The review concluded that cardiovascular and electrodermal measures showed consistent effectiveness in discriminating between deceptive and truthful subjects, while also identifying the absence of inferential… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews

Related research topics

Explore more research.

Search and filter our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed studies.

Need to book now? Our online booking system is open 24/7. Speak directly with our team about your test or booking.