Professional Examiners Trained to APA Standards
140+ Professional Testing Locations Across the U.S. & Canada
Trusted by 10,000+ Clients, Attorneys & Organizations
LieDetectorTest.com Private & Confidential Polygraph Provider

Home › Polygraph Research › Journals › Applied Cognitive Psychology

Journal file

Applied Cognitive Psychology

54 peer-reviewed polygraph studies · 1996–2025

54Studies
106Authors
5Categories
1996–2025Year range

Authors in Applied Cognitive Psychology [106]

Aldert Vrij 12 Bruno J. Verschuere 8 Samantha Mann 5 Galit Nahari 4 Gáspár Lukács 3 Charles F. Bond 3 Ewout H. Meijer 2 T.J. Luke 2 Renate Volbert 2 L. Hope 2 Ronald Philip Fisher 2 M. Hartwig 2 P.A. Granhag 2 M. Robinson 2 Jiyoung Lee 1 Kevin K. John 1 Germán Gálvez‐García 1 Patricio Mena‐Chamorro 1 Alejandro Moliné 1 Tomás Espinoza‐Palavicino 1 Oscar Iborra 1 Emilio Gómez‐Milán 1 A.B. Lob 1 N. Chakir 1 James C. Mundt 1 Sarah Volz 1 Marc‐André Reinhard 1 Patrick Müller 1 Glynis Bogaard 1 Charles Robert Honts 1 Mark Handler 1 Pamela K. Shaw 1 Michael C. Gougler 1 E. Mac Giolla 1 Verena A. Oberlader 1 Laura Quinten 1 Rainer Banse 1 Alexander F. Schmidt 1 Felix D. Schönbrodt 1 Nir Rozmann 1 G. Bogaard 1 Van der I. Plas 1 L. Pontigia 1 Karlos Luna 1 Pedro B. Albuquerque 1 M. Sauerland 1 E. Wolfs 1 R. Crans 1 Kristyn A. Jones 1 Deryn Strange 1 B. Kleinberg, van der Y. Toolen 1 A. Arntz 1 Bennett Kleinberg 1 Lara Warmelink 1 Arnoud Arntz 1 Amy‐May Leach 1 Renée L. Snellings 1 Mariane Gazaille 1 Jacqueline R. Evans 1 Stephen W. Michael 1 E. Dawson 1 M.B. Russano 1 F.M. Narchet 1 S.M. Kleinman 1 C.A. Meissner 1 G.L.J. Lancaster 1 B. Waller 1 E. Noordraven 1 Amina Memon 1 G. Visu-Petra 1 M. Miclea 1 L. Visu-Petra 1 Sharon Leal 1 Samantha Ann Mann 1 Ronald P. Fisher 1 J. Masip 1 H. Alonso 1 E. Garrido 1 C. Herrero 1 I. Blandón-Gitlin 1 K. Pezdek 1 S.D. Lindsay 1 L. Hagen 1 J. Glicksohn 1 I. Nachson 1 T. L. Seymour 1 J. R. Kerlin 1 Bella M. DePaulo 1 J. Rothwell 1 Z. Bandar 1 O'J. Shea 1 McLean 1 E. Robbins 1 S. L. Sporer 1 B. Schwandt 1 A. Y. Lee 1 Katja Erdmann 1 Claudia Böhm 1 Hayley Evans 1 Lucy Akehurst 1 L.A. Stromwall 1 ESTEFANIA HERNÁNDEZ-FERNAUD 1 MARISA ALONSO-QUECUTY 1 L. Akehurst 1 G. Köhnken 1 R. Bull 1

Research topics

All studies [54]

Every peer-reviewed study from Applied Cognitive Psychology in our database, ordered newest first.

[001]
Jiyoung Lee, Kevin K. John (2025)

Detecting Deepfakes Through Emotion?: Facial Expression and Emotional Contagion as Dual Indicators of Deepfake Credibility

Deepfakes exhibited lower overall and negative emotions compared to authentic videos. Counterintuitively, audiences' reduced emotional responses to deepfakes were associated…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Machine Learning Ethics & Policy Theory & Mechanisms
[003]
Gáspár Lukács (2025)

A Filtering Response Time Concealed Information Test for Searching for Relevant Concealed Items

The filtering RT-CIT protocol reduced testing time by approximately 59% (from 17 to 7 minutes) compared to conventional approaches while…

Reaction Time & Cognitive Load Methods CIT Laboratory Study Machine Learning Computer Scoring Accuracy & Validity
[004]
A.B. Lob, N. Chakir, Bruno J. Verschuere (2024)

Does (Biasing) Nonverbal Information Deteriorate the Accuracy of the Take-the-Best Heuristic for Deception Detection?

The detailedness heuristic achieved accuracy rates of 60.9-71.8% compared to 52.6-56.9% for unguided judgments (d = 0.55-0.76), but strongly biasing…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms
[006]
James C. Mundt (2022)

Ocular-motor deception testing in civilly detained sexually violent persons: An alternative to post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing?

ODT accuracy rates in sexually violent persons were not significantly less than the published benchmark of 80% accuracy, demonstrating potential…

Neuroimaging & New Technologies Eye Tracking PCSOT Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity
[007]
Sarah Volz, Marc‐André Reinhard, Patrick Müller (2022)

The confidence‐accuracy relation – A comparison of metacognition measures in lie detection

Regardless of analytical measure used, none of the 12 studies demonstrated a confidence-accuracy relationship, indicating people lack metacognitive insight into…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms Systematic Review
[008]
Glynis Bogaard, Ewout H. Meijer (2022)

No evidence that instructions to ignore nonverbal cues improve deception detection accuracy

Instructions to ignore nonverbal cues produced no improvement in deception detection accuracy across three experiments. Participants continued to rely on…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms Training & Standards
[009]
Charles Robert Honts, Mark Handler, Pamela K. Shaw, Michael C. Gougler (2021 • LANDMARK META-ANALYSIS)

A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of the Comparison Question Polygraph Test

The largest meta-analysis ever conducted on the CQT, analyzing 138 datasets. Found a meta-analytic effect size of 0.69 including inconclusives.…

Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews CQT Meta-Analysis Accuracy & Validity Field Study Laboratory Study
[010]
Bruno J. Verschuere (2021)

Discriminating deceptive from truthful statements using the verifiability approach: A meta-analysis

Truth-tellers provided significantly more verifiable details (d = 0.49) and a higher proportion of verifiable details (d = 0.49) than…

Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews Meta-Analysis Review Article Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms
[011]
Bruno J. Verschuere (2021)

The verifiability approach to deception detection: A preregistered direct replication of the information protocol condition of Nahari, Vrij, and Fisher (2014b)

Truth tellers provided significantly more verifiable details than liars (d = 0.49), confirming the Verifiability Approach prediction, but the effect…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms Europe
[012]
E. Mac Giolla, T.J. Luke (2021)

Does the cognitive approach to lie detection improve the accuracy of human observers?

Cognitive approaches to lie detection produced 60% accuracy overall, but only 55% after bias correction—barely above chance levels of 50%.

Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews Meta-Analysis Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms Laboratory Study
[014]
Gáspár Lukács (2021)

Addressing selective attrition in the enhanced response time-based concealed information test: A within-subject replication

The enhanced CIT with filler items significantly outperformed the standard version (d=1.07, p<.001) in a within-subject design that eliminated selective…

Reaction Time & Cognitive Load Methods CIT Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Countermeasures
[016]
G. Bogaard, Ewout H. Meijer, Van der I. Plas (2020)

A model statement does not enhance the verifiability approach

Model statements did not enhance the discriminability of the verifiability approach, as both truth-tellers and liars similarly increased verifiable details…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms
[017]
Samantha Mann, Aldert Vrij, L. Hope, L. Pontigia (2020)

Detecting smugglers: Identifying strategies and behaviours in individuals in possession of illicit objects

Observer detection of smugglers was remarkably poor with accuracy rates of 48% and 39.2% in two experiments, despite smugglers actually…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity United Kingdom Screening
[018]
Karlos Luna, Pedro B. Albuquerque (2020)

Do incompatible alternatives in a testimony affect witness credibility?

Witnesses reporting incompatible alternatives were consistently judged as less credible across three experiments. Educating participants that witnesses can legitimately report…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms
[019]
M. Sauerland, E. Wolfs, R. Crans, Bruno J. Verschuere (2019)

Testing a potential alternative to traditional identification procedures: Reaction time-based concealed information test does not work for lineups with cooperative witnesses

The RT-CIT demonstrated negligibly small diagnostic validity (d = 0.14, 95% CI 0.08-0.19) across five experiments, failing to effectively identify…

Reaction Time & Cognitive Load Methods CIT Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms
[020]
Aldert Vrij (2019)

Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues

Observers achieve only 52% accuracy when viewing nonverbal behavior alone versus 63% when hearing verbal content. Meta-analyses show that of…

Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews Review Article Theory & Mechanisms Accuracy & Validity History
[021]
Kristyn A. Jones, Deryn Strange (2019)

The impact of hedged testimony on judgments of credibility

Without cross-examination, participants counterintuitively rated testimony as more credible when the assault occurred 15 years ago (age 4 encoding). However,…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Legal Admissibility Ethics & Policy Theory & Mechanisms
[022]
Gáspár Lukács (2019)

Information leakage in the response time-based concealed information test

Information leakage severely reduced traditional RT-CIT accuracy to AUC = .61-.64, but the novel Inducer-CIT maintained substantially higher accuracy of…

Reaction Time & Cognitive Load Methods CIT Laboratory Study Countermeasures Accuracy & Validity
[023]
B. Kleinberg, van der Y. Toolen, Aldert Vrij, A. Arntz, Bruno J. Verschuere (2018)

Automated Verbal Credibility Assessment of Intentions: The Model Statement Technique and Predictive Modeling

Machine learning classification achieved 80% accuracy in initial testing but dropped to 63% in independent validation, with liars paradoxically including…

AI & Machine Learning in Deception Detection Machine Learning Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Screening
[027]
Galit Nahari, Aldert Vrij, Ronald Philip Fisher (2014)

The verifiability approach: Countermeasures facilitate its ability to discriminate between truths and lies

When forewarned about verifiability checking, truth-tellers provided significantly more verifiable details than liars (d = 1.14), demonstrating that the Verifiability…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Countermeasures Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms
[028]
M. Hartwig, Charles F. Bond (2014)

Lie detection from multiple cues: A meta-analysis

Multiple behavioral cues combined yield 67.9% accuracy in lie detection (R = .52), substantially exceeding the 54% accuracy of single-cue…

Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews Meta-Analysis Accuracy & Validity
[029]
Jacqueline R. Evans, Stephen W. Michael (2014)

Detecting Deception in Non‐Native English Speakers

Observers showed a systematic lie bias toward non-native English speakers, judging them as deceptive more often than native speakers, with…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms International
[030]
T.J. Luke, E. Dawson, M. Hartwig, P.A. Granhag (2014)

How awareness of possible evidence induces forthcoming counter-interrogation strategies

When alerted to possible evidence from surveillance cameras, guilty suspects polarized into extremely withholding or extremely forthcoming verbal strategies, while…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Criminal Investigation Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms Counter-Countermeasures
[032]
G.L.J. Lancaster, Aldert Vrij, L. Hope, B. Waller (2013)

Sorting the liars from the truth tellers: The benefits of asking unanticipated questions

Liars' verbal responses showed a greater decline in details across three of four question pairs when shifting from anticipated to…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Theory & Mechanisms Accuracy & Validity
[033]
Galit Nahari (2013)

Primacy effect in credibility judgments: The vulnerability of verbal cues to biased interpretations

A robust primacy effect was found: participants judged the same narrator as more credible when the detail-rich account came first,…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms Israel
[034]
E. Noordraven, Bruno J. Verschuere (2013)

Predicting the sensitivity of the reaction time-based concealed information test

Target-irrelevant response patterns effectively predicted individual CIT sensitivity, improving discrimination accuracy from 86% to 97% hit rate (ROC AUC 0.95)…

Reaction Time & Cognitive Load Methods CIT Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Scoring Methods
[036]
G. Visu-Petra, M. Miclea, L. Visu-Petra (2012)

Reaction time-based detection of concealed information in relation to individual differences in executive functioning

The RT-CIT successfully differentiated guilty from innocent participants, with set-shifting and inhibition directly related to deception accuracy and speed; individuals…

Reaction Time & Cognitive Load Methods CIT Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms
[038]
J. Masip, H. Alonso, E. Garrido, C. Herrero (2009)

Training to detect what? The biasing effect of training on veracity judgments

Deception-focused training increased lie judgments while truthfulness-focused training decreased them; both training types inflated confidence without improving accuracy; traditional training…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Training & Standards Theory & Mechanisms Laboratory Study
[039]
Bruno J. Verschuere (2009)

Detecting concealed information with reaction times: Validity and comparison with the polygraph

Both the RT-based CIT and the polygraph-based CIT successfully discriminated between concealed and control autobiographical information, with similarly high effect…

Reaction Time & Cognitive Load Methods CIT Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms
[040]
I. Blandón-Gitlin, K. Pezdek, S.D. Lindsay, L. Hagen (2009)

Criteria-Based Content Analysis of true and suggested accounts of events

CBCA successfully discriminated true from suggested events overall, but discriminative power collapsed for participants with full false memories, where CBCA…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms
[041]
Galit Nahari, J. Glicksohn, I. Nachson (2009)

Do textual features affect credibility judgment? It all depends on who is the judge

High-absorption individuals judged sparse narratives as more credible than low-absorption individuals, while both groups rated detail-rich narratives similarly, demonstrating that…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Theory & Mechanisms Survey
[042]
T. L. Seymour, J. R. Kerlin (2008)

Successful detection of verbal and visual concealed knowledge using an RT-based paradigm

Both verbal and visual stimulus modalities produced equivalent detection accuracy, with face pictures achieving 91% hit rates and 3% false-alarm…

Reaction Time & Cognitive Load Methods CIT Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity
[043]
Charles F. Bond, Bella M. DePaulo (2008 • DECEPTION DETECTION)

Training to Detect Deception: No Improvement with Training or Feedback

Showed that neither training nor feedback improved human deception detection significantly. Individual differences in detection ability were minimal, further supporting…

Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews Meta-Analysis Accuracy & Validity Training & Standards Laboratory Study
[044]
Samantha Mann, Aldert Vrij, Ronald Philip Fisher, M. Robinson (2008)

See no lies, hear no lies: Differences in discrimination accuracy and response bias when watching or listening to police suspect interviews

Officers listening to audio-only interviews achieved significantly higher accuracy (60%) than those watching audio-visual presentations (47%). Exposure to visual cues…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Theory & Mechanisms United Kingdom Training & Standards
[045]
J. Rothwell, Z. Bandar, O'J. Shea, McLean (2006)

Silent talker: a new computer-based system for the analysis of facial cues to deception

The Silent Talker system achieved 74% accuracy (p < 0.001) classifying individual deceptive responses and 80% accuracy (p = 0.035)…

AI & Machine Learning in Deception Detection Machine Learning Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Computer Scoring
[047]
S. L. Sporer, B. Schwandt (2006)

Paraverbal indicators of deception: a meta-analytic synthesis

Only 2 of 9 paraverbal speech behaviors showed reliable associations with deception in weighted analyses. Small effect sizes and substantial…

Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews Meta-Analysis Voice Stress Analysis Theory & Mechanisms Accuracy & Validity
[048]
Charles F. Bond, A. Y. Lee (2005)

Language of lies in prison: Linguistic classification of inmates' truthful and deceptive natural language

Automated linguistic analysis achieved 69.7-71.1% accuracy in classifying prisoner statements, with software showing unbiased criteria while human judges (especially younger…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Machine Learning Computer Scoring Accuracy & Validity Criminal Investigation
[049]
Katja Erdmann, Renate Volbert, Claudia Böhm (2004)

Children report suggested events even when interviewed in a non‐suggestive manner: what are its implications for credibility assessment?

CBCA criteria showed few significant differences between true and fictitious statements after repeated suggestive interviews, with experts unable to reliably…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study Accuracy & Validity Ethics & Policy
[051]
P.A. Granhag, L.A. Stromwall (2002)

Repeated interrogations: Verbal and non-verbal cues to deception

Liars displayed significantly fewer smiles, self-manipulations, pauses, and less gaze aversion than truth-tellers, with these differences increasing over time. Contrary…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study CQT Theory & Mechanisms Criminal Investigation
[052]
Aldert Vrij, Samantha Mann (2001)

Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: the case of a convicted murderer

Police officers showed 70% accuracy detecting truthful statements but only 57% accuracy detecting lies in authentic high-stakes scenarios, and officers…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Case Study Criminal Investigation Accuracy & Validity Field Study
[053]
ESTEFANIA HERNÁNDEZ-FERNAUD, MARISA ALONSO-QUECUTY (1997)

The Cognitive Interview and Lie Detection: a New Magnifying Glass for Sherlock Holmes?

Truthful narrations contained more contextual and sensorial information than deceptive narrations, with significantly larger differences when participants were interviewed using…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory Study CIT Accuracy & Validity
[054]
L. Akehurst, G. Köhnken, Aldert Vrij, R. Bull (1996)

Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behaviour

Police officers and lay people held equally inaccurate beliefs about deceptive behavior, with both groups overestimating the reliability of eye…

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Survey Training & Standards Accuracy & Validity Ethics & Policy

Explore more research.

Search and filter our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed studies from 1331 journals.

Need to book now? Our online booking system is open 24/7. Speak directly with our team about your test or booking.