Home › Polygraph Research › Researchers › William George Iacono
Researcher file
William George Iacono
Critic of polygraph testing validity and behavior genetics researcher
Researcher record
About William George Iacono
William George Iacono is an American psychologist who serves as Distinguished McKnight University Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of Minnesota, where he is also co-director, with Matt McGue, of the Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research. He holds professorial appointments in Psychology, Law, and Neuroscience at the University of Minnesota and retired from the university in February 2023 after 40 years as a faculty member. Iacono served as Past-President of the Society for Psychophysiological Research (1996-97) and former Member of the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute's Curriculum and Research Guidance Committee.
Iacono is one of the most prominent scientific critics of polygraph testing in forensic applications. Inspired by David Lykken's 1974 critique of lie detection, Iacono and colleagues have conducted extensive analysis of polygraph methods and science. His work has systematically challenged the validity of the Comparison Question Test (CQT), the most widely used polygraph technique. His research concluded that the scientific basis of the CQT is weak, extant research is of low quality, the polygraph profession's claims for high accuracy are unfounded, and although the CQT has greater than chance accuracy, its error rate is unknown. Notable contributions include a 1991 field study that attempted to circumvent the confession-criterion methodological problem, pioneering surveys documenting scientific opinion on polygraph validity, and comprehensive critiques of field study methodology showing how sampling bias inflates accuracy estimates. His 2024 review article provided a fifty-year perspective on how the polygraph industry has remained largely unchanged despite scientific criticism.
In 2008, Iacono received the Society for Psychophysiological Research's highest honor, the Award for Distinguished Contributions to Psychophysiology, which the society reserves for the very best scholars in psychophysiology. He also received the Distinguished Scientific Award for an Early Career Contribution to Psychology from the American Psychological Association in 1987, and in 2009 received the Distinguished Scientist Award from the Society for the Science of Clinical Psychology. He testified before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee in 2001 on polygraph screening of federal employees. He has served as chair or member of numerous NIH study sections and has been a consultant on lie detection to a wide variety of government agencies. His collaboration with frequent co-authors including Christopher J. Patrick, David T. Lykken, and Gershon Ben-Shakhar has produced influential critiques published in leading journals and legal reference volumes.
While Iacono's polygraph research represents a major strand of his career, his broader work spans behavior genetics and psychophysiology. He uses family, adoptive, and twin study designs to investigate the development and etiology of common mental disorders, including substance use, antisocial, and major depressive disorders, work carried out through the Minnesota Center for Twin and Family Research which he co-directs. His contributions to behavioral genetics via twin and family study designs, specifically examining schizophrenia, common mental disorders and substance abuse, are immense. His polygraph work connects to this broader program through studies examining psychophysiological markers, including research on how psychopathy affects polygraph accuracy, the use of event-related potentials to detect concealed memories, and studies of countermeasures using antianxiety drugs.
Research methodology profile
Research areas
Co-author network
Researchers who have co-authored studies with William George Iacono.
Publications [29]
All peer-reviewed studies by William George Iacono in our database.
Psychology and the Lie Detector Industry: A Fifty-Year Perspective
Comprehensive 50-year retrospective on polygraph science since Lykken (1974). Reviews the evolution of CQT, CIT, and screening tests. Notes that government promotion has expanded polygraph use, particularly for sex offender… [002] 2021 Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender ProfilingFallacies in the estimation of the validity of the Comparison Question Polygraph Test: A reply to Ginton (2020)
The authors dismiss Ginton's defenses and conclude his paired-examination validity estimates are untrustworthy due to confirmation bias, criterion contamination, and violated methodological assumptions that inflate apparent accuracy. [003] 2020 Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender ProfilingIacono and Ben-Shakhar's response to Ginton (2020): Validity estimates from paired testing
The authors conclude that Ginton's polygraph validity estimates from paired testing cannot be trusted due to unresolved issues with confession contamination, examiner bias, and confirmation bias in real-world field settings. [004] 2019 Law and Human BehaviorCurrent Status of Forensic Lie Detection with the Comparison Question Technique: An Update
Updated review of CQT research, reaffirming conclusions from the NRC (2003). Argued for caution in interpreting CQT accuracy claims, noting potential overestimation in experimental studies. Stimulated significant debate and further… [005] 2019 Legal and Criminological PsychologyThe case against the use of polygraph examinations to monitor post-conviction sex offenders
The CQT has no scientific basis for use with sex offenders and suffers from major theoretical and methodological flaws that make it even more problematic in correctional settings than in… [006] 2018 Law and Human BehaviorCurrent status of forensic lie detection with the comparison question technique: An update of the 2003 National Academy of Sciences report on polygraph testing
Research quality has not improved in the 15 years since the NAS report, and fundamental problems with CQT validation—weak theoretical foundations, poor study quality, and unknown error rates—remain unresolved. [007] 2015 In Granhag, P. A., Vrij, A., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.), Detecting DeceptionForensic application of event-related brain potentials to detect guilty knowledge
Laboratory studies consistently demonstrate high accuracy for P300-GKT with guilty participants showing significantly larger P300 amplitudes to crime-relevant probes, with estimated false positive rates of 2-5%. However, virtually no field… [008] 2013 The Handbook of Forensic PsychologyEmploying Polygraph Assessment
The CQT has weak theoretical foundations, is biased against innocent examinees, and vulnerability to countermeasures. Field validity studies systematically overestimate accuracy due to confession-verification bias, and retest reliability remains unexamined… [009] 2008 Criminal Justice and BehaviorEffective Policing
The CQT cannot be considered scientifically valid due to weak theoretical foundations, bias against the innocent, and countermeasure vulnerability. Only 30-36% of surveyed scientists consider the CQT based on sound… [010] 2008 Criminal Justice and BehaviorEffective Policing: Understanding How Polygraph Tests Work and Are Used
Examined how polygraph tests function in real law enforcement contexts and their practical effectiveness as investigative tools. Found that polygraph’s primary value may be in eliciting confessions and admissions rather… [011] 2008 Physiology & BehaviorAccuracy of polygraph techniques: Problems using confessions to determine ground truth
Confession-based field studies produce invalid accuracy estimates because the criterion (confession) and test outcome are not independent, with the method virtually guaranteeing matching results and inflating apparent accuracy to unrealistic… [012] 2007 Beyond Common SensePolygraph Testing
Field research shows the CQT correctly identifies only 55-57% of innocent suspects, meaning 43-45% are falsely classified as deceptive. Scientific surveys reveal that fewer than 36% of psychophysiologists consider the… [013] 2006 • MOTIVATION STUDY PsychophysiologyThe Effects of Motivation on the Detection of Deception in CQT
Examined how participant motivation levels affect CQT accuracy. Found higher motivation produced larger physiological differences between truth and deception, supporting real-world generalizability. [014] 2001 Journal of Forensic Psychology PracticeForensic “Lie Detection”
[015] 2001 Journal of Forensic Psychology PracticeForensic 'Lie Detection': Procedures Without Scientific Basis
Studies published in top scientific journals indicated that approximately 43% of innocent subjects fail the CQT polygraph test. Surveys of relevant scientific experts found that only 30-36% believed the CQT… [016] 1999 Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert TestimonyUpdate: The scientific status of research on polygraph techniques: The case against polygraph tests
Approximately 40–43% of innocent individuals fail the CQT in high-quality real-world field studies, and the only methodologically unbiased field study found CQT accuracy for innocent suspects at just 57%; fewer… [017] 1999Polygraph (lie detector) testing: The state of the art
Approximately 43% of innocent subjects fail polygraph examinations, there is no distinctive physiological lie response that polygraphs can detect, and the Comparison Question Test has weak theoretical foundation and is… [018] 1997 Journal of Applied PsychologyThe Validity of the Lie Detector: Two Surveys of Scientific Opinion
The surveys achieved exceptionally high response rates (91% and 74%) and provided an unbiased assessment of scientific consensus on polygraph validity from relevant experts. [019] 1997 Various PublicationsSurvey of Scientists on CIT/GKT Validity
Polled 363 scientists from the American Psychological Association and the Society for Psychophysiological Research. Found that the scientific community was more supportive of CIT than CQT, though opinions varied widely.… [020] 1997 – 2023 Modern Scientific Evidence (Legal Volume Series)Modern Scientific Evidence: The Case For and Against Polygraph Admissibility
Ongoing point-counterpoint exchanges between leading polygraph researchers, published in a legal reference intended for judges and lawyers. Covers the complete spectrum of admissibility arguments under Daubert standards. [021] 1992 • SEMINAL PsychophysiologyThe Identification of Concealed Memories Using Event-Related Potentials and Implicit Behavioral Measures
Reported 90% and above hit rate in detecting concealed thought using P300-based methods. Combined ERP and behavioral measures for improved classification, establishing neural CIT paradigm. [022] 1992 Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of ReviewsOf Course We Can Evaluate Polygraph Techniques
[023] 1992 Journal of Applied PsychologyUse of antianxiety drugs as countermeasures in the detection of guilty knowledge
Drug status had no influence on GKT outcomes—diazepam, meprobamate, and propranolol all failed as countermeasures. Innocent subjects who coincidentally scored high on recognition memory tests of crime details tended to… [024] 1991 Journal of Applied PsychologyValidity of the control question polygraph test: The problem of sampling bias
The study found 55% accuracy for innocent subjects but could not establish a valid accuracy estimate for guilty subjects due to near-total dependence on confessions (only 2% independently verified), exposing… [025] 1991 PsychophysiologyA comparison of field and laboratory polygraphs in the detection of deception
Overall hit rates were essentially the same for laboratory polygraph quantitative measures (73%) and field polygraph numerical scores (79%), with electrodermal activity and respiration suppression serving as the best discriminating… [026] 1989 Journal of Applied PsychologyPsychopathy, threat, and polygraph test accuracy
Psychopathy did not confer any advantage in defeating the CQT — guilty psychopaths were detected just as easily as guilty non-psychopaths at 87% accuracy — but the CQT performed near… [027] 1988 In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deceptionAssessing deception: Polygraph techniques
The authors concluded that polygraph techniques, particularly the widely-used Control Question Test, lack sound theoretical foundations, are vulnerable to countermeasures, and cannot provide reliable error rate estimates due to pervasive… [028] 1987 PsychophysiologyValidity and reliability of the control question polygraph test: A scientific investigation
[029] 1987 PsycEXTRA DatasetWhat psychologists should know about lie detection
Field and laboratory studies of the Control Question Test produced mixed and inconclusive results, with some studies finding it accurate and others showing it was fallible and biased against innocent…Explore all research.
Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.