Home › Polygraph Research › Researchers › Steven W. Horowitz
Researcher file
Steven W. Horowitz
Comparison question techniques and meta-analysis of polygraph validity in deception detection
Researcher record
About Steven W. Horowitz
Steven W. Horowitz was affiliated with the Department of Psychology at Central Connecticut State University in New Britain, Connecticut, where he held a faculty position. His doctoral dissertation on "The role of the control question in physiological detection of deception" was completed at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City in 1988, where he worked closely with the renowned polygraph research laboratory led by David C. Raskin.
Horowitz made significant contributions to the scientific understanding of comparison question polygraph techniques. His meta-analysis of 14 mock crime studies of the control question polygraph technique revealed accuracies ranging from chance to 100% correct, helping to establish the empirical foundation for understanding variability in polygraph accuracy. His 1997 study published in Psychophysiology examined different types of comparison questions in deception detection, comparing relevant-irrelevant, trivial directed lie, personal directed lie, and probable lie formats in a controlled experiment with 120 participants. This work was instrumental in refining the theoretical understanding of how comparison questions function in the Comparison Question Test (CQT).
Horowitz held a master's degree and worked as part of the University of Utah polygraph research team that conducted major field validation studies for the National Institute of Justice. He was a frequent collaborator with John C. Kircher, David C. Raskin, and Charles R. Honts—a team that represented the leading polygraph research laboratory in the United States during the 1980s and produced numerous influential studies on both laboratory analog studies and field validity research. His work appeared in top-tier journals and contributed to the 1989 book chapter "Recent Laboratory and Field Research on Polygraph Techniques," which became a foundational reference in the field.
Research methodology profile
Research areas
Co-author network
Researchers who have co-authored studies with Steven W. Horowitz.
Publications [7]
All peer-reviewed studies by Steven W. Horowitz in our database.
The role of the control question in physiological detection of deception
[002] 1997 • EXPERIMENTAL PsychophysiologyThe Role of Comparison Questions in Physiological Detection of Deception
Mock crime study with 120 participants examining comparison question mechanisms. Found comparison questions produced different physiological patterns for innocent vs. guilty subjects, providing empirical support for the CQT rationale. [003] 1989 • LABORATORY/FIELD Book ChaptersRecent Laboratory and Field Research on Polygraph Techniques
Comprehensive review describing DLT laboratory and field research showing it is at least as accurate as the CQT with fewer false positive errors, simpler to construct, and a good substitute… [004] 1988 Unpublished manuscript / Later in Raskin (1989)Meta-Analysis of the Comparison Question Test
The first meta-analysis of the CQT. Found significant moderator effects for subject type, incentives, and decision policy. All three variables predicted accuracy but showed high covariations. This pioneering work laid… [005] 1988 • LANDMARK FIELD STUDY National Institute of Justice, Grant No. 85-IJ-CX-0040A Study of the Validity of Polygraph Examinations in Criminal Investigation
Major NIJ-funded field study demonstrating that CQT accuracy exceeded 90% when properly employed by skilled examiners. Established benchmark for forensic polygraph validity in actual criminal investigations. [006] 1988 • META-ANALYSIS Law and Human BehaviorMeta-Analysis of Mock Crime Studies of the Control Question Polygraph Technique
Early meta-analysis of 14 CQT laboratory studies. Found significant moderator effects including student vs. community participants and motivation levels. Accuracy exceeded 85% across studies. [007] 1988 • CROSS-VALIDATION University of Utah (Grant Report)Replication and Cross-Validation of Utah Mock Crime Study
Cross-validation study confirming earlier findings. Demonstrated replicability of CQT accuracy across multiple independent experiments with different examiners and participant pools.Explore all research.
Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.