Professional Examiners Trained to APA Standards
140+ Professional Testing Locations Across the U.S. & Canada
Trusted by 10,000+ Clients, Attorneys & Organizations
LieDetectorTest.com Private & Confidential Polygraph Provider

HomePolygraph ResearchResearchers › Steven W. Horowitz

Researcher file

Steven W. Horowitz

Comparison question techniques and meta-analysis of polygraph validity in deception detection

7Studies
1988–1997Active period
3Co-authors
3Research areas
6Journals

Researcher record

NameSteven W. Horowitz
AffiliationCentral Connecticut State UniversityUnited States
Publications7 peer-reviewed studies in this database
Active period1988–1997
Research focusComparison question techniques and meta-analysis of polygraph validity in deception detection

About Steven W. Horowitz

Steven W. Horowitz was affiliated with the Department of Psychology at Central Connecticut State University in New Britain, Connecticut, where he held a faculty position. His doctoral dissertation on "The role of the control question in physiological detection of deception" was completed at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City in 1988, where he worked closely with the renowned polygraph research laboratory led by David C. Raskin.

Horowitz made significant contributions to the scientific understanding of comparison question polygraph techniques. His meta-analysis of 14 mock crime studies of the control question polygraph technique revealed accuracies ranging from chance to 100% correct, helping to establish the empirical foundation for understanding variability in polygraph accuracy. His 1997 study published in Psychophysiology examined different types of comparison questions in deception detection, comparing relevant-irrelevant, trivial directed lie, personal directed lie, and probable lie formats in a controlled experiment with 120 participants. This work was instrumental in refining the theoretical understanding of how comparison questions function in the Comparison Question Test (CQT).

Horowitz held a master's degree and worked as part of the University of Utah polygraph research team that conducted major field validation studies for the National Institute of Justice. He was a frequent collaborator with John C. Kircher, David C. Raskin, and Charles R. Honts—a team that represented the leading polygraph research laboratory in the United States during the 1980s and produced numerous influential studies on both laboratory analog studies and field validity research. His work appeared in top-tier journals and contributed to the 1989 book chapter "Recent Laboratory and Field Research on Polygraph Techniques," which became a foundational reference in the field.

Research methodology profile

Laboratory · 4 Meta-Analysis · 2 Field Study · 1

Research areas

Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews 3 Field Validity Studies 2 Comparison Question Test (CQT) 1

Co-author network

Researchers who have co-authored studies with Steven W. Horowitz.

Publications [7]

All peer-reviewed studies by Steven W. Horowitz in our database.

[001] 1997 Psychophysiology

The role of the control question in physiological detection of deception

[002] 1997 • EXPERIMENTAL Psychophysiology

The Role of Comparison Questions in Physiological Detection of Deception

Mock crime study with 120 participants examining comparison question mechanisms. Found comparison questions produced different physiological patterns for innocent vs. guilty subjects, providing empirical support for the CQT rationale. Comparison Question Test (CQT) Laboratory
[003] 1989 • LABORATORY/FIELD Book Chapters

Recent Laboratory and Field Research on Polygraph Techniques

Comprehensive review describing DLT laboratory and field research showing it is at least as accurate as the CQT with fewer false positive errors, simpler to construct, and a good substitute… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews Laboratory
[004] 1988 Unpublished manuscript / Later in Raskin (1989)

Meta-Analysis of the Comparison Question Test

The first meta-analysis of the CQT. Found significant moderator effects for subject type, incentives, and decision policy. All three variables predicted accuracy but showed high covariations. This pioneering work laid… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews Meta-Analysis Laboratory
[005] 1988 • LANDMARK FIELD STUDY National Institute of Justice, Grant No. 85-IJ-CX-0040

A Study of the Validity of Polygraph Examinations in Criminal Investigation

Major NIJ-funded field study demonstrating that CQT accuracy exceeded 90% when properly employed by skilled examiners. Established benchmark for forensic polygraph validity in actual criminal investigations. Field Validity Studies Field Study
[006] 1988 • META-ANALYSIS Law and Human Behavior

Meta-Analysis of Mock Crime Studies of the Control Question Polygraph Technique

Early meta-analysis of 14 CQT laboratory studies. Found significant moderator effects including student vs. community participants and motivation levels. Accuracy exceeded 85% across studies. Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews Meta-Analysis Laboratory
[007] 1988 • CROSS-VALIDATION University of Utah (Grant Report)

Replication and Cross-Validation of Utah Mock Crime Study

Cross-validation study confirming earlier findings. Demonstrated replicability of CQT accuracy across multiple independent experiments with different examiners and participant pools. Field Validity Studies

Explore all research.

Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.

Need to book now? Our online booking system is open 24/7. Speak directly with our team about your test or booking.