Home › Polygraph Research › Researchers › Stephen B. Porter
Researcher file
Stephen B. Porter
Deception detection, false memory, psychopathy, and forensic psychology
Researcher record
About Stephen B. Porter
Dr. Stephen Porter is a Professor of Psychology at the University of British Columbia Okanagan campus in Kelowna, where he serves as the Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Psychological Science & Law (CAPSL). After earning his Ph.D. in forensic psychology from UBC and working as a prison psychologist, he spent a decade as a professor at Dalhousie University before transferring to UBC Okanagan in 2009. As a registered forensic psychologist in British Columbia, he is frequently consulted by Canadian courts and has been qualified as an expert witness in areas including "dangerousness and risk for violence" and "memory and the factors involved in credibility assessments".
Porter's research on deception detection has focused extensively on high-stakes lies in forensic contexts. His most comprehensive study to date examined extremely high-stakes, real-life deception by meticulously analyzing televised footage of 78 individuals emotionally pleading for the return of missing relatives (with about half later convicted of killing the missing person), coding footage frame-by-frame for a total of 74,731 frames. His groundbreaking research on facial microexpressions analyzed over 104,550 frames in 697 expressions, finding that inconsistent emotional leakage occurred in 100% of participants at least once and lasted longer than the current definition of a microexpression suggests. He developed Dangerous Decisions Theory (DDT), a theoretical framework explaining how judges and jurors assess credibility in the courtroom, proposing that initial judgments of trustworthiness based on a defendant's face play a major role in initiating a series of 'dangerous' decisions concerning credibility. His early work on verbal indicators of deception (1996) found that only three Statement Validity Analysis clues—amount of detail reported, coherence, and admissions of lack of memory—significantly differentiated truthful and deceptive accounts.
Porter has provided deception detection training to more than 30 professional groups, including psychologists, psychiatrists, lawyers, judges, immigration boards, private investigators and journalists. He received the Canadian Psychological Association's award for distinguished contributions to education and training in 2015 for "excellence in undergraduate and graduate level teaching". He has been consulted by police in serious crime investigations and provides training in deception detection and psychopathy to law enforcement, mental health professional groups, government agencies, and trial judges. His work has been widely profiled, including in the New Yorker and the Globe and Mail.
Porter has published numerous scholarly articles on psychopathy and violent behaviour, deception detection, and forensic aspects of memory with funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). His work spans multiple disciplines in forensic psychology, including research on false memory, eyewitness testimony, psychopathy, and legal decision-making, making him a prominent figure at the intersection of psychology, law, and neuroscience.
Research methodology profile
Research areas
Co-author network
Researchers who have co-authored studies with Stephen B. Porter.
Publications [15]
All peer-reviewed studies by Stephen B. Porter in our database.
Discovering Deceit: Applying Laboratory and Field Research in the Search for Truthful and Deceptive Behavior
[002] 2013 The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & PsychologyCatching liars: Training mental health and legal professionals to detect high-stakes lies
Overall detection accuracy increased significantly from M = 46.4% to 80.9% following a single comprehensive, empirically based full-day training workshop — a gain of more than 34 percentage points among… [003] 2012 Law and Human BehaviorCry Me a River: Identifying the Behavioral Consequences of Extremely High-Stakes Interpersonal Deception
A multi-cue behavioral model combining emotional facial leakage (upper face surprise, lower face happiness), reduced word count, and elevated tentative language correctly classified 92.3% of genuine and 88.5% of deceptive… [004] 2012 Journal of Nonverbal BehaviorSecrets and Lies: Involuntary Leakage in Deceptive Facial Expressions as a Function of Emotional Intensity
Emotional leakage occurred in 98.3% of participants attempting to mask their feelings, was significantly more prolonged and frequent during high-intensity versus low-intensity emotions, and was most evident in the upper… [005] 2012 PLoS ONEThe Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming
All three studies failed to find support for NLP's eye movement-deception hypothesis. Eye movement patterns did not differ between lying and truth-telling, NLP training did not improve lie detection accuracy,… [006] 2010 Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & PsychologyEvaluation of the effectiveness of a brief deception detection training program
Brief three-hour training improved healthcare professionals' deception detection accuracy from 51.2% to 60.7%, with gains primarily in correctly identifying deceptive statements rather than truthful ones. [007] 2010 Psychology, Crime & LawDangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability
Untrustworthy-looking defendants were convicted of serious crimes based on less evidence and with greater confidence than comparably trustworthy-looking defendants facing identical scenarios, with the effect most pronounced when evidence was… [008] 2010 Legal and Criminological PsychologyThe Truth About Lies: What Works in Detecting High-Stakes Deception
No single behavioral cue consistently reveals deception; best-validated indicators include illustrators, blink and pause rate, speech rate, vague descriptions, repeated details, contextual embedding, reproduction of conversations, and emotional facial leakage.… [009] 2009 Legal and Criminological PsychologyDangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom
DDT posits that instantaneous facial trustworthiness judgments are enduring and powerfully bias evidence interpretation in court; even experienced trial judges hold false stereotypes about deception and demonstrate measurable vulnerability to… [010] 2008 Psychological ScienceReading Between the Lies: Identifying Concealed and Falsified Emotions in Universal Facial Expressions
Inconsistent emotional leakage occurred in 100% of participants attempting deception, yet true microexpressions appeared in only 21.95% of participants and just 2% of all expressions — and were nearly as… [011] 2008 Canadian Journal of Behavioural ScienceIs the Face a Window to the Soul? Investigation of the Accuracy of Intuitive Judgments of the Trustworthiness of Human Faces
Intuitive trustworthiness judgments of criminal faces were at chance level (M = 48.8%), while judgments of humanitarian faces were modestly above chance (M = 62.7%); extended viewing time conferred no… [012] 2006 Offenders' Memories of Violent CrimesMemory for Murder: The Qualities and Credibility of Homicide Narratives by Perpetrators
Psychopaths exaggerated the reactive nature of their instrumental homicides to a greater degree than non-psychopaths and were more likely to omit major offense details. This distortion was primarily associated with… [013] 2000 Law and Human BehaviorTruth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception
Federal parole officers improved from a below-chance baseline accuracy of 40.4% to 76.7% following structured lie detection training, significantly outperforming untrained controls (62.5%), demonstrating that deception detection skill is trainable… [014] 1996 Law and Human BehaviorThe language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context
Only 16.7% (3 out of 18) of tested verbal deception clues significantly differentiated truthful from deceptive accounts, with all effective indicators derived exclusively from Statement Validity Analysis. [015] 1994 Psychology, Crime & LawCredibility assessment of criminal suspects through statement analysis
Explore all research.
Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.