Professional Examiners Trained to APA Standards
140+ Professional Testing Locations Across the U.S. & Canada
Trusted by 10,000+ Clients, Attorneys & Organizations
LieDetectorTest.com Private & Confidential Polygraph Provider

HomePolygraph ResearchResearchers › Stephen B. Porter

Researcher file

Stephen B. Porter

Deception detection, false memory, psychopathy, and forensic psychology

15Studies
1994–2013Active period
12Co-authors
3Research areas
12Journals

Researcher record

NameStephen B. Porter
AffiliationUniversity of British Columbia OkanaganCanada
Publications15 peer-reviewed studies in this database
Active period1994–2013
Research focusDeception detection, false memory, psychopathy, and forensic psychology

About Stephen B. Porter

Dr. Stephen Porter is a Professor of Psychology at the University of British Columbia Okanagan campus in Kelowna, where he serves as the Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Psychological Science & Law (CAPSL). After earning his Ph.D. in forensic psychology from UBC and working as a prison psychologist, he spent a decade as a professor at Dalhousie University before transferring to UBC Okanagan in 2009. As a registered forensic psychologist in British Columbia, he is frequently consulted by Canadian courts and has been qualified as an expert witness in areas including "dangerousness and risk for violence" and "memory and the factors involved in credibility assessments".

Porter's research on deception detection has focused extensively on high-stakes lies in forensic contexts. His most comprehensive study to date examined extremely high-stakes, real-life deception by meticulously analyzing televised footage of 78 individuals emotionally pleading for the return of missing relatives (with about half later convicted of killing the missing person), coding footage frame-by-frame for a total of 74,731 frames. His groundbreaking research on facial microexpressions analyzed over 104,550 frames in 697 expressions, finding that inconsistent emotional leakage occurred in 100% of participants at least once and lasted longer than the current definition of a microexpression suggests. He developed Dangerous Decisions Theory (DDT), a theoretical framework explaining how judges and jurors assess credibility in the courtroom, proposing that initial judgments of trustworthiness based on a defendant's face play a major role in initiating a series of 'dangerous' decisions concerning credibility. His early work on verbal indicators of deception (1996) found that only three Statement Validity Analysis clues—amount of detail reported, coherence, and admissions of lack of memory—significantly differentiated truthful and deceptive accounts.

Porter has provided deception detection training to more than 30 professional groups, including psychologists, psychiatrists, lawyers, judges, immigration boards, private investigators and journalists. He received the Canadian Psychological Association's award for distinguished contributions to education and training in 2015 for "excellence in undergraduate and graduate level teaching". He has been consulted by police in serious crime investigations and provides training in deception detection and psychopathy to law enforcement, mental health professional groups, government agencies, and trial judges. His work has been widely profiled, including in the New Yorker and the Globe and Mail.

Porter has published numerous scholarly articles on psychopathy and violent behaviour, deception detection, and forensic aspects of memory with funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). His work spans multiple disciplines in forensic psychology, including research on false memory, eyewitness testimony, psychopathy, and legal decision-making, making him a prominent figure at the intersection of psychology, law, and neuroscience.

Research methodology profile

Laboratory · 3 Randomized · 1

Research areas

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection 8 Training, Standards & Professional Practice 3 Legal & Policy Studies 2

Co-author network

Researchers who have co-authored studies with Stephen B. Porter.

Publications [15]

All peer-reviewed studies by Stephen B. Porter in our database.

[001] 2013 Applied Issues in Investigative Interviewing, Eyewitness Memory, and Credibility Assessment

Discovering Deceit: Applying Laboratory and Field Research in the Search for Truthful and Deceptive Behavior

[002] 2013 The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology

Catching liars: Training mental health and legal professionals to detect high-stakes lies

Overall detection accuracy increased significantly from M = 46.4% to 80.9% following a single comprehensive, empirically based full-day training workshop — a gain of more than 34 percentage points among… Training, Standards & Professional Practice
[003] 2012 Law and Human Behavior

Cry Me a River: Identifying the Behavioral Consequences of Extremely High-Stakes Interpersonal Deception

A multi-cue behavioral model combining emotional facial leakage (upper face surprise, lower face happiness), reduced word count, and elevated tentative language correctly classified 92.3% of genuine and 88.5% of deceptive… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[004] 2012 Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

Secrets and Lies: Involuntary Leakage in Deceptive Facial Expressions as a Function of Emotional Intensity

Emotional leakage occurred in 98.3% of participants attempting to mask their feelings, was significantly more prolonged and frequent during high-intensity versus low-intensity emotions, and was most evident in the upper… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[005] 2012 PLoS ONE

The Eyes Don’t Have It: Lie Detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming

All three studies failed to find support for NLP's eye movement-deception hypothesis. Eye movement patterns did not differ between lying and truth-telling, NLP training did not improve lie detection accuracy,… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory
[006] 2010 Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a brief deception detection training program

Brief three-hour training improved healthcare professionals' deception detection accuracy from 51.2% to 60.7%, with gains primarily in correctly identifying deceptive statements rather than truthful ones. Training, Standards & Professional Practice
[007] 2010 Psychology, Crime & Law

Dangerous decisions: The impact of first impressions of trustworthiness on the evaluation of legal evidence and defendant culpability

Untrustworthy-looking defendants were convicted of serious crimes based on less evidence and with greater confidence than comparably trustworthy-looking defendants facing identical scenarios, with the effect most pronounced when evidence was… Legal & Policy Studies Laboratory
[008] 2010 Legal and Criminological Psychology

The Truth About Lies: What Works in Detecting High-Stakes Deception

No single behavioral cue consistently reveals deception; best-validated indicators include illustrators, blink and pause rate, speech rate, vague descriptions, repeated details, contextual embedding, reproduction of conversations, and emotional facial leakage.… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[009] 2009 Legal and Criminological Psychology

Dangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom

DDT posits that instantaneous facial trustworthiness judgments are enduring and powerfully bias evidence interpretation in court; even experienced trial judges hold false stereotypes about deception and demonstrate measurable vulnerability to… Legal & Policy Studies
[010] 2008 Psychological Science

Reading Between the Lies: Identifying Concealed and Falsified Emotions in Universal Facial Expressions

Inconsistent emotional leakage occurred in 100% of participants attempting deception, yet true microexpressions appeared in only 21.95% of participants and just 2% of all expressions — and were nearly as… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[011] 2008 Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

Is the Face a Window to the Soul? Investigation of the Accuracy of Intuitive Judgments of the Trustworthiness of Human Faces

Intuitive trustworthiness judgments of criminal faces were at chance level (M = 48.8%), while judgments of humanitarian faces were modestly above chance (M = 62.7%); extended viewing time conferred no… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory
[012] 2006 Offenders' Memories of Violent Crimes

Memory for Murder: The Qualities and Credibility of Homicide Narratives by Perpetrators

Psychopaths exaggerated the reactive nature of their instrumental homicides to a greater degree than non-psychopaths and were more likely to omit major offense details. This distortion was primarily associated with… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[013] 2000 Law and Human Behavior

Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception

Federal parole officers improved from a below-chance baseline accuracy of 40.4% to 76.7% following structured lie detection training, significantly outperforming untrained controls (62.5%), demonstrating that deception detection skill is trainable… Training, Standards & Professional Practice Randomized
[014] 1996 Law and Human Behavior

The language of deceit: An investigation of the verbal clues to deception in the interrogation context

Only 16.7% (3 out of 18) of tested verbal deception clues significantly differentiated truthful from deceptive accounts, with all effective indicators derived exclusively from Statement Validity Analysis. Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[015] 1994 Psychology, Crime & Law

Credibility assessment of criminal suspects through statement analysis

Explore all research.

Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.

Need to book now? Our online booking system is open 24/7. Speak directly with our team about your test or booking.