Home › Polygraph Research › Researchers › Stanley M. Slowik
Researcher file
Stanley M. Slowik
Polygraph validity, historical development of deception detection, and forensic interviewing practices
Researcher record
About Stanley M. Slowik
Stanley M. Slowik received his polygraph training from Reid College in Chicago in 1973 and was employed as a polygraph examiner, Director, criminal interrogator and instructor with John E. Reid & Associates from 1968 to 1986. He is President of Stanley M. Slowik, Inc., based in Evergreen, Colorado, where he has operated as an independent practitioner, researcher, and expert witness. Slowik is a practitioner, instructor, researcher and expert witness in the fields of forensic interviewing, polygraph and criminal interrogation. He is recognized as a nationally recognized polygraph examiner, and has qualified as an expert regarding polygraph, interviewing and interrogation over the past 40 years.
Slowik's research contributions span both historical scholarship and field validity studies. His 2019 article "Chicago: Where Polygraph Becomes a Science," co-authored with Frank S. Horvath, examined the development of polygraph as a scientific discipline in early 20th-century Chicago, documenting contributions of pioneers like John E. Reid, Leonarde Keeler, and John Larson. His 2020 work "Critical Changes Over the 100 Year Evolution of Polygraph Practices" traced the technical and procedural developments in polygraph methodology. Slowik's empirical research includes his 1975 study on the relative accuracy of polygraph examiner diagnosis across different physiological channels (respiration, blood pressure, and GSR) and his 1983 analysis of OTA-qualifying field studies examining the validity of the Comparison Question Test (CQT) in real-world applications.
Beyond core polygraph research, Slowik has been a frequent contributor to professional literature on legal and practical issues affecting polygraph examiners. He has published extensively on employment law topics including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA), and medical marijuana policies in pre-employment screening. Slowik is a frequent contributor to Polygraph, the journal of the American Polygraph Association. In 2013, Stanley M. Slowik received the American Polygraph Association's highest honor, recognizing his sustained contributions to the field. He has also co-authored book reviews and critical analyses with Frank S. Horvath, examining fundamental concepts in polygraph practice and advocating for the integration of extra-polygraphic information in examiner decision-making.
Slowik's work bridges practitioner expertise and academic scholarship. His collaborations with prominent researchers including Frank S. Horvath reflect his role in connecting field experience with research validation. His expertise extends to forensic interviewing and interrogation techniques, particularly their application to specialized populations such as children, as evidenced by his 2008 article on forensic interviewing, polygraph, and child deception. Through his company and expert witness work, Slowik has influenced both the scientific understanding and practical application of credibility assessment techniques across law enforcement, private sector, and legal contexts.
Research methodology profile
Research areas
Co-author network
Researchers who have co-authored studies with Stanley M. Slowik.
Publications [5]
All peer-reviewed studies by Stanley M. Slowik in our database.
Critical Changes Over the 100 Year Evolution of Polygraph Practices
The most important changes originated from the 1930 Northwestern crime laboratory and subsequent field research by John Reid and Fred Inbau, transforming polygraphy from rudimentary physiological measurements into a structured… [002] 2019 European PolygraphChicago: Where Polygraph Becomes a Science
Chicago became the epicenter for polygraph innovation through the convergence of academic institutions, progressive criminal justice reforms, and pioneering practitioners, with John Reid's development of the Comparison Question Technique addressing… [003] IDENTIFIED BY OTA (1983) • 10 KEY FIELD STUDIES Various journals (1960s–1980s)OTA-Qualifying Field Studies of CQT Validity
The 10 field studies identified by the Office of Technology Assessment as meeting minimum scientific standards. Together, they showed: false positive rates ranging from 0–75% (avg 19.1%) and false negative… [004] 1982 PolygraphGlobal Evaluation: An Inductive Approach to Case Resolution
Global evaluation, when properly conducted, is a systematic integration of multiple data sources—not subjective impression—and serves to identify possible polygraph errors and enhance correct decisions when physiological and behavioral indicators… [005] 1975 • FIELD STUDY Journal of Police Science and AdministrationRelative Accuracy of Polygraph Examiner Diagnosis of Respiration, Blood Pressure, and GSR Recordings
Field study comparing diagnostic value of individual physiological channels. Found electrodermal (GSR) measures provided the most diagnostic information, followed by cardiovascular and respiratory channels.Explore all research.
Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.