Home › Polygraph Research › Researchers › Pär Anders Granhag
Researcher file
Pär Anders Granhag
Deception detection, investigative interviewing, and the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique
Researcher record
About Pär Anders Granhag
Pär Anders Granhag is a Professor of Psychology at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, where he received his B.A. and Ph.D. degrees. In 2000, he became the Founding Director of the research unit for Criminal, Legal, and Investigative Psychology, and has for 30 years conducted research on deception detection, interview and interrogation techniques, and investigative psychology. He has published over 200 scientific reports on topics relating to deception detection.
Granhag is internationally recognized as the co-developer of the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique, a groundbreaking interrogation method that has fundamentally changed how investigators approach suspect interviews. The SUE technique has pioneered a new line of research centering on strategic ways of interviewing suspects in order to elicit cues to truth and deception. The technique focuses on the strategic timing and disclosure of evidence during interviews to detect inconsistencies in suspects' statements, moving away from confrontational approaches toward information-gathering methods. Officers trained in SUE achieved a higher deception detection accuracy rate (65%) compared to untrained interviewers (43%).
He is the author/editor of ten books, including Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004) and Detecting Deception: Current Challenges and Cognitive Approaches (Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015). He is the past President of the European Association of Psychology and Law, and the past editor of Applied Cognitive Psychology. Granhag has been cited by over 11,000 publications, reflecting his profound influence on the field. His work has been adopted internationally by law enforcement and intelligence agencies seeking evidence-based interrogation methods.
He has published extensively in the field of legal and criminological psychology, particularly on deception and eyewitness testimony, and conducts training of law-enforcement personnel. His work spans multiple disciplines including investigative psychology, forensic psychology, and human intelligence gathering, bridging the gap between psychological research and practical application in criminal justice settings. Granhag frequently collaborates with Maria Hartwig, with whom he has co-authored numerous influential studies on deception detection and interrogation strategies.
Research methodology profile
Research areas
Co-author network
Researchers who have co-authored studies with Pär Anders Granhag.
Publications [10]
All peer-reviewed studies by Pär Anders Granhag in our database.
Scientific Interrogation: The Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) Technique
The SUE technique represents a paradigm shift toward information-gathering approaches that optimize accuracy in credibility assessment and investigative efficiency compared to conventional deception detection methods. [002] 2016 Frontiers in PsychologyCorrigendum: Detecting Deception within Small Groups: A Literature Review
Truth-telling groups exhibit significantly more interactive and communicative behaviors during collective interviews compared to lying groups, who lack shared transactive memory and merely repeat rehearsed fabricated stories. [003] 2016 Frontiers in PsychologyDetecting Deception within Small Groups: A Literature Review
Truth-telling groups are often equal to or less consistent than lying groups when interviewed separately, contradicting the consistency heuristic. However, when interviewed collectively, truthful groups display significantly more interactive and… [004] 2014 Detecting DeceptionThe Strategic Use of Evidence Technique
The SUE technique framework demonstrates that strategic evidence disclosure, combined with systematic questioning, can substantially improve deception detection accuracy by eliciting statement-evidence inconsistencies, with synthesized research showing trained interviewers achieving… [005] 2014 Detecting DeceptionDiscriminating between True and False Intentions
[006] 2004 The Detection of Deception in Forensic ContextsResearch on deception detection: intersections and future challenges
[007] 2004 Police QuarterlyPolice Officers’ Lie Detection Accuracy: Interrogating Freely Versus Observing Video
Police officers failed to detect deception better than chance in both conditions, with no accuracy advantage for active interrogation over passive observation. Interrogators showed a pronounced truth bias and relied… [008] 2003 Psychology, Crime & LawDeception among pairs: “Let's say we had lunch and hope they will swallow it!”
[009] 2001 The Journal of PsychologyDeception Detection: Interrogators' and Observers' Decoding of Consecutive Statements
Consistency over time was by far the most commonly used cue for veracity judgments, yet deceptive statements were at least equally consistent as truthful statements. The predictive accuracy of the… [010] 2001 Legal and Criminological PsychologyDeception detection based on repeated interrogations
Lie-catchers given access to multiple statements did not outperform those with single statements, yet repeated interrogations inflated confidence in judgments. Consistency over time was the most frequently cited cue but…Explore all research.
Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.