Professional Examiners Trained to APA Standards
140+ Professional Testing Locations Across the U.S. & Canada
Trusted by 10,000+ Clients, Attorneys & Organizations
LieDetectorTest.com Private & Confidential Polygraph Provider

Home › Polygraph Research › Researchers › Michael T. Bradley

Researcher file

Michael T. Bradley

Concealed Information Test validity and psychophysiological detection of deception

17Studies
1981–2016Active period
18Co-authors
6Research areas
8Journals

Researcher record

NameMichael T. Bradley
AffiliationUniversity of New Brunswick — Canada
Publications17 peer-reviewed studies in this database
Active period1981–2016
Research focusConcealed Information Test validity and psychophysiological detection of deception

About Michael T. Bradley

Michael T. Bradley is a Professor of Psychology at the University of New Brunswick Saint John in Canada. His research interests include information detection with the polygraph and general problems resulting from a historic emphasis on inferential statistics over accurate measurement. Over the course of his career spanning from the 1980s into the 2010s, Bradley established himself as a leading academic researcher examining the psychological and psychophysiological foundations of deception detection, particularly through the Concealed Information Test (CIT).

Bradley made substantial contributions to understanding the validity and limitations of the CIT in polygraph testing. His landmark 2011 study with Malik and Cullen examined how accuracy rates with polygraphs using concealed information tests depend on memory for crime details, with some participants reading instructions on murdering a dummy victim that specified exact crime details asked on the subsequent CIT. His research explored critical issues including information leakage to innocent suspects, the role of personality variables (such as extraversion and Machiavellianism) in detection accuracy, and the Control Question Test with actual controls for truth. One influential study showed correct identification of 86% of guilty subjects and 83 to 89% of innocent subjects using modified control questions that were unambiguous and answered truthfully. Bradley also developed the Guilty Action Test (GAT), a variant of the CIT designed to reduce false positives among informed innocents.

Bradley's work has been highly influential in the polygraph research community, with over 1,600 citations to his publications. His series of studies on information leakage conducted with colleagues from the 1980s through 2011 became foundational references in the field, frequently cited in discussions of CIT validity and the challenges of applying laboratory findings to real-world settings. He collaborated extensively with researchers including Michel Pierre Janisse on early psychophysiological studies, and later worked with Fahreen J. Malik and Michael C. Cullen on realistic mock crime scenarios. His research has been published in premier journals including Psychophysiology, Perceptual and Motor Skills, and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Beyond polygraph research, Bradley's work extends into broader methodological issues in psychology, including statistical measurement and effect size estimation. He maintained his affiliation with the Department of Psychology at the University of New Brunswick, P.O. Box 5050 Tucker Park Road, Saint John, N.B., Canada, where his research bridged laboratory experimental psychology, psychophysiology, and applied forensic science. His critical examinations of CIT validity under realistic conditions have shaped contemporary understanding of both the promise and limitations of memory detection techniques in credibility assessment.

Research methodology profile

Laboratory · 11

Research areas

Laboratory & Analog Studies 6 Concealed Information Test (CIT) 3 Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews 1 Neuroimaging & New Technologies 1 Comparison Question Test (CQT) 1 Psychophysiology & Autonomic Responses 1

Co-author network

Researchers who have co-authored studies with Michael T. Bradley.

Publications [17]

All peer-reviewed studies by Michael T. Bradley in our database.

[001] 2016 Psychophysiology

Temperature effects on polygraph detection of concealed information

Among guilty participants, electrodermal and cardiovascular measures were least effective at 10°C, with electrodermal results optimal at 22°C and cardiovascular results optimal at 34°C. Temperature did not affect innocent participants'… Concealed Information Test (CIT) Laboratory
[002] 2011 Perceptual and Motor Skills

Memory instructions, vocalization, mock crimes, and concealed information tests with a polygraph

Guilty participants who incidentally encoded crime details without explicit priming showed significantly lower memory, detection scores, and detection rates compared to those who received explicit instructions about the details. Victim… Laboratory & Analog Studies Laboratory
[003] 2011 Memory detection: Theory and application of the concealed information test

Leakage of information to innocent suspects

Research demonstrates that mere knowledge of crime details elicits CIT effects regardless of how the information was acquired, creating false-positive risk for informed innocents. However, guilty suspects often show stronger… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews
[004] 2010 Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement

Eliciting information from groups: Social information and the Concealed Information Test.

[005] 2008 Psychophysiology

The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation

Pupillary changes were significantly larger when viewing emotionally arousing pictures (both pleasant and unpleasant) compared to neutral pictures, regardless of valence, indicating that pupil dilation reflects sympathetically-mediated arousal rather than… Neuroimaging & New Technologies
[006] 2004 Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

Positions of truthfully answered controls on control question tests with the polygraph

Control questions answered truthfully could effectively differentiate guilty from innocent participants, but only when presented before relevant questions. When relevant questions came first, most participants failed regardless of guilt, with… Comparison Question Test (CQT) Laboratory
[007] 1996 Polygraph

Control question tests by police and laboratory polygraph operators on a mock crime and real events

[008] 1992 Journal of Applied Psychology

Awareness of crime-relevant information and the Guilty Knowledge Test

The study achieved perfect or near-perfect detection rates with a hierarchical physiological response pattern (guilty > informed innocent > uninformed innocent), demonstrating that informed innocent participants could be successfully differentiated… Laboratory & Analog Studies Laboratory
[009] 1992 Journal of Applied Psychology

Aware of crime-relevant information and the guilty knowledge test

Guilty participants' skin resistance scores were significantly higher than informed innocents', which were higher than uninformed innocents', with perfect classification achieved. The study demonstrated that awareness of crime details elevates… Concealed Information Test (CIT) Laboratory
[010] 1988 Perceptual and Motor Skills

Choice and the Detection of Deception

The study demonstrated that examinees' voluntary choices regarding cooperation significantly influenced physiological detection patterns, with cooperative choices potentially attenuating electrodermal responses and affecting the validity of deception detection. Laboratory & Analog Studies Laboratory
[011] 1987 Perceptual and Motor Skills

Machiavellianism, the Control Question Test and the detection of deception

[012] 1987 Psychophysiology

Machiavellianism and CIT Accuracy

Found that subjects high in Machiavellianism showed different response patterns during CIT. Demonstrated that personality characteristics can influence detection accuracy, informing examination interpretation. Laboratory & Analog Studies Laboratory
[013] 1984 Psychophysiology

Innocence, information, and the guilty knowledge test in the detection of deception

Guilty subjects showed significantly higher detection scores than all innocent groups. Informed innocent subjects generally did not differ from uninformed subjects, and most did not produce false positive classifications, supporting… Concealed Information Test (CIT) Laboratory
[014] 1984 Psychophysiology

Innocent, information, and the guilty knowledge test in the detection of deception

[015] 1984 Psychophysiology

Alcohol and the psychophysiological detection of deception

Alcohol intoxication during the mock crime (encoding phase) significantly reduced detection accuracy on both Control Question Test and Guilty Knowledge Test protocols, whereas alcohol intoxication during the actual polygraph examination… Laboratory & Analog Studies Laboratory
[016] 1981 Personality and Individual Differences

Extraversion and the detection of deception

Extraverts demonstrated selective physiological responding to crime-relevant questions and were more accurately detected, while introverts showed diffuse responding to both critical and non-critical questions that masked deception-related differentiation. Psychophysiology & Autonomic Responses Laboratory
[017] 1981 Psychophysiology

Accuracy demonstrations, threat, and the detection of deception: Cardiovascular, electrodermal, and pupillary measures

Detection accuracy on the Control Question Test increased systematically with demonstrated polygraph effectiveness (dose-response relationship), while the Concealed Information Test showed weaker effects from the accuracy demonstration manipulation. Skin resistance… Laboratory & Analog Studies Laboratory

Explore all research.

Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.

Need to book now? Our online booking system is open 24/7. Speak directly with our team about your test or booking.