Professional Examiners Trained to APA Standards
140+ Professional Testing Locations Across the U.S. & Canada
Trusted by 10,000+ Clients, Attorneys & Organizations
LieDetectorTest.com Private & Confidential Polygraph Provider

HomePolygraph ResearchResearchers › Maria Hartwig

Researcher file

Maria Hartwig

Psychology of deception detection and strategic interrogation techniques, particularly the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) method

7Studies
2004–2025Active period
10Co-authors
1Research areas
6Journals

Researcher record

NameMaria Hartwig
AffiliationJohn Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New YorkUnited States
Publications7 peer-reviewed studies in this database
Active period2004–2025
Research focusPsychology of deception detection and strategic interrogation techniques, particularly the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) method

About Maria Hartwig

Maria Hartwig is a Professor of Psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice (City University of New York), where she has been on the faculty since 2006. She completed her graduate training in Sweden, earning her PhD from the University of Gothenburg in 2005, where she conducted empirical research on social perception and judgment in legal settings. She is Co-Founder and Director of Project Aletheia, a platform aimed at bridging the gap between the science and practice of interrogation.

Her scientific expertise is in the psychology of interrogation and the related topic of the psychology of deception. Hartwig is best known for developing the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique, an interview method designed to elicit cues to deception by strategically managing case information and evidence disclosure. Research on her 2014 meta-analysis found that lies can be detected with nearly 70% accuracy, and this level of detectability is stable across settings. Studies have shown that SUE-trained interviewers achieved deception detection accuracy rates of 65% compared to 43% for untrained interviewers. Her work has demonstrated that strategic questioning and delayed evidence disclosure creates inconsistencies in deceptive statements while truth-tellers remain consistent.

She has produced significant research with the support of various government agencies including law enforcement, the Department of Defense, and the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group (HIG), and her work on strategic questioning techniques is incorporated in the training programs of the HIG and the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC). Her research on interviewing to detect deception has attracted the attention of law enforcement and intelligence agencies in the United States and Europe, and in 2011, she testified before the United States Congress about behavioral science and airport security. She serves on the editorial boards of Law and Human Behavior and Legal and Criminological Psychology, and received the Saleem Shah Award for Early Career Excellence in Psychology and Law in 2012.

Hartwig's work extends beyond traditional deception detection to encompass broader interrogation reform and justice system improvements. Her collaborations with Swedish researcher Pär Anders Granhag and her frequent co-author Charles F. Bond have produced influential meta-analyses examining why people fail at detecting deception. Project Aletheia, founded in 2020 with Mark Fallon (a former NCIS special agent), serves as a collaborative platform for researchers and practitioners working toward evidence-based interrogation practices that respect human rights while improving investigative outcomes.

Research methodology profile

Laboratory · 2 Survey · 1

Research areas

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection 5

Co-author network

Researchers who have co-authored studies with Maria Hartwig.

Publications [7]

All peer-reviewed studies by Maria Hartwig in our database.

[001] 2025 European Polygraph

Scientific Interrogation: The Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) Technique

The SUE technique represents a paradigm shift toward information-gathering approaches that optimize accuracy in credibility assessment and investigative efficiency compared to conventional deception detection methods. Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[002] 2022 Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature

Faculty Opinions recommendation of The connection between deception detection and financial exploitation of older (vs. young) adults.

[003] 2022 Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature

Faculty Opinions recommendation of 'Please tell me all you remember': a comparison between British and Arab interviewees' free narrative performance and its implications for lie detection.

British truth tellers reported significantly more details than Arab truth tellers (d = 1.32), while the veracity effect for details was more pronounced in British samples than Arab samples. The… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory
[004] 2021 Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Deception and lie detection in the courtroom: The effect of defendants wearing medical face masks.

[005] 2014 Detecting Deception

The Strategic Use of Evidence Technique

The SUE technique framework demonstrates that strategic evidence disclosure, combined with systematic questioning, can substantially improve deception detection accuracy by eliciting statement-evidence inconsistencies, with synthesized research showing trained interviewers achieving… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[006] 2013 PsycEXTRA Dataset

Investment Professionals' Beliefs about Deception

Investment professionals believed their lie detection accuracy exceeds 65%, substantially higher than the 50-54% rate found in meta-analyses. They subscribed to invalid stereotypes about gaze aversion and fidgeting while correctly… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Survey
[007] 2004 Police Quarterly

Police Officers’ Lie Detection Accuracy: Interrogating Freely Versus Observing Video

Police officers failed to detect deception better than chance in both conditions, with no accuracy advantage for active interrogation over passive observation. Interrogators showed a pronounced truth bias and relied… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory

Explore all research.

Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.

Need to book now? Our online booking system is open 24/7. Speak directly with our team about your test or booking.