Home › Polygraph Research › Researchers › Kurt D. Danielson
Researcher file
Kurt D. Danielson
Event-related potentials and implicit measures in concealed information detection
Researcher record
About Kurt D. Danielson
K.D. Danielson was a researcher at the University of Minnesota in the early 1990s who contributed to pioneering work in psychophysiological deception detection. Based on the publication record, Danielson appears to have been a graduate student or research collaborator working under the mentorship of William G. Iacono in the Department of Psychology during this period.
Danielson's research contribution focused on the use of event-related potentials (ERPs) and implicit behavioral measures for detecting concealed memories. The 1992 study with Allen, Iacono, and Danielson developed a methodology for identifying concealed memories using event-related potentials and implicit behavioral measures, published in Psychophysiology. The procedure identified learned material with high rates of accuracy, whether or not subjects gave intentional responses indicating they had previously learned it, using Bayesian posterior probabilities to indicate the probability for each person that material was learned. This work represented an important advance in Concealed Information Test (CIT) methodology by addressing individual differences through sophisticated statistical approaches.
The 1992 publication has been widely cited in the deception detection literature and contributed to the foundational research on ERP-based alternatives to traditional polygraph testing. Danielson worked as part of a productive research team that included John J.B. Allen and William G. Iacono, both of whom became prominent figures in psychophysiological research at major universities.
Research methodology profile
Research areas
Co-author network
Researchers who have co-authored studies with Kurt D. Danielson.
Publications [1]
All peer-reviewed studies by Kurt D. Danielson in our database.
Explore all research.
Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.