Professional Examiners Trained to APA Standards
140+ Professional Testing Locations Across the U.S. & Canada
Trusted by 10,000+ Clients, Attorneys & Organizations
LieDetectorTest.com Private & Confidential Polygraph Provider

HomePolygraph ResearchResearchers › Jerzy Konieczny

Researcher file

Jerzy Konieczny

Forensic polygraph methodology, legal admissibility of polygraph evidence, and theoretical foundations of psychophysiological detection

6Studies
2007–2019Active period
1Co-authors
4Research areas
2Journals

Researcher record

NameJerzy Konieczny
AffiliationAndrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow UniversityPoland
Publications6 peer-reviewed studies in this database
Active period2007–2019
Research focusForensic polygraph methodology, legal admissibility of polygraph evidence, and theoretical foundations of psychophysiological detection

About Jerzy Konieczny

Jerzy Konieczny was a Polish polygraph researcher affiliated with Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University in Poland. He was active in the polygraph research community from 2007 to 2014, contributing regularly to the European Polygraph journal, where his work focused on the theoretical foundations, legal applications, and methodological challenges of polygraph examination. In 2009, Konieczny authored "Badania poligraficzne: Podręcznik dla profesjonalistów" (Polygraph examination: Handbook for professionals), described as the first Polish monographic work devoted to polygraph examinations published in Poland in more than 20 years.

Konieczny's research contributions spanned multiple critical areas of polygraph science. His work examined forensic identification theory, exploring how polygraph examination relates to traditional concepts of forensic science and evidence analysis. He investigated the crisis of traditional forensic identification concepts, analyzing expert errors and methodological awareness in forensic sciences. His 2007 case study on false memory implementation in polygraph examinations represented pioneering work in understanding countermeasures, while his research on uncertainty in polygraph examination addressed fundamental questions about probabilistic reasoning and diagnostic accuracy. Konieczny also contributed to understanding alternative technologies, examining whether voice analyzers represented a viable deception detection method, and explored the legal admissibility of polygraph evidence in criminal proceedings.

As a frequent contributor to European Polygraph, Konieczny served as a respected reviewer and commentator on major developments in the field. He authored a significant review of the Meta-Analytic Survey of Criterion Accuracy of Validated Polygraph Techniques prepared for the American Polygraph Association Board of Directors, demonstrating his engagement with international polygraph research standards. His handbook was noted for discussing various polygraph techniques including the Control Question Test, the Relevant-Irrelevant Test, and—for the first time in Polish literature—the Cullen-Bradley Control Questions Test, covering applications in criminal cases, employment screening, and sex offender management.

Konieczny's work bridged polygraph science with broader issues in criminology and forensic methodology. His research on forensic identification challenged practitioners to think critically about expert testimony and statistical inference in legal contexts. The 2009 handbook was described as having no match in European literature, indicating his role in advancing European polygraph practice and establishing methodological standards for the profession in Poland and beyond.

Research methodology profile

Case Study · 1

Research areas

Scoring & Test Data Analysis 2 Legal & Policy Studies 2 Voice Stress Analysis 1 Countermeasures Research 1

Co-author network

Researchers who have co-authored studies with Jerzy Konieczny.

Publications [6]

All peer-reviewed studies by Jerzy Konieczny in our database.

[001] 2019 Internal Security

Likelihood Ratio in Evidential Evaluation of Polygraph Examination

The paper demonstrates that likelihood ratio frameworks can quantify the evidential weight of polygraph results by comparing the probability of observed physiological responses under deception versus truthfulness hypotheses, offering a… Scoring & Test Data Analysis
[002] 2014 European Polygraph

Polygraph examination in analysis of evidence

The paper provides a systematic framework for understanding polygraph results in relation to fundamental concepts in evidence law and forensic science, including the distinction between direct and circumstantial evidence. Legal & Policy Studies
[003] 2010 European Polygraph

Polygraph Examination as Scientific Evidence

The work provides a legal and scientific framework for evaluating polygraph evidence admissibility, particularly examining polygraph methodology against Daubert criteria and established forensic science standards. Legal & Policy Studies
[004] 2009 European Polygraph

A Renaissance in Voice Analysers as Tools for Detection of Deception?

Research revealed that voice stress analyzers were disqualified by US regulatory bodies and military research found no validity exceeding chance levels, with courts rejecting results as non-credible by 2001. Voice Stress Analysis
[005] 2007 European Polygraph

An attempt to falsify the results of a polygraph test through the implementation of false memory: a case study

The study explored the relationship between false memory techniques and polygraph test validity, though specific results are not accessible without the full text. Countermeasures Research Case Study
[006] 2007 European Polygraph

Selected aspects of uncertainty in polygraph examination

The study identifies multiple sources of uncertainty in polygraph examinations that can impact test reliability and accuracy. Scoring & Test Data Analysis

Explore all research.

Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.

Need to book now? Our online booking system is open 24/7. Speak directly with our team about your test or booking.