Home › Polygraph Research › Researchers › Haneen Deeb
Researcher file
Haneen Deeb
Verbal deception detection and investigative interviewing techniques in forensic contexts
Researcher record
About Haneen Deeb
Haneen Deeb is a Senior Research Associate at the University of Portsmouth, where she earned her Ph.D. examining inconsistencies as cues to deception from the University of Gothenburg. She previously completed an M.A. at the American University of Beirut studying the role of pre-identification warnings in the post-identification feedback effect. Her doctoral research examined various interview techniques that enhance lie detection in forensic contexts, with a specific focus on interview techniques that elicit differences in statement consistency between lie tellers and truth tellers.
Deeb continues to examine novel interview techniques and their effects on the elicitation of verbal cues, with particular interest in sketch-based interviews and opinion-based interviews on different types of details such as PLATO details and complications. She has made significant contributions to research on deception detection methods including the Model Statement technique, sketching while narrating, and verbal cues to deception. Her work has demonstrated that sketching while narrating is an effective interview technique for eliciting information and cues to deceit. Most recently, she co-authored a 2025 article on the Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE) technique in European Polygraph, examining how this scientific interrogation method enhances deception detection accuracy in forensic contexts.
Deeb's research has been cited over 532 times, reflecting her growing influence in the field of investigative interviewing and lie detection. She works closely with leading deception detection researchers including Aldert Vrij, Sharon Leal, and Samantha Mann at Portsmouth, forming part of a prolific research team. Her collaborative work includes helping with statistical analyses and methodological development on multiple projects funded by the Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. She serves as a peer reviewer for multiple journals in the field, contributing to the quality control of deception detection research.
Deeb's work bridges cognitive psychology, forensic psychology, and investigative practice. Her research examines how memory processes and cognitive load affect truthful versus deceptive statements, with applications extending from police investigations to security screening and intelligence gathering. She has investigated specialized topics including multiple interviews, omission lies, verbal veracity cues, and the effects of interpreters on deception detection, making her research relevant to both domestic and international investigative contexts.
Research methodology profile
Research areas
Co-author network
Researchers who have co-authored studies with Haneen Deeb.
Publications [3]
All peer-reviewed studies by Haneen Deeb in our database.
Verbal cues to deceit when lying through omitting information: Examining the effect of a Model Statement interview protocol
Truth tellers consistently reported more complications than lie tellers across omission scenarios, while lie tellers provided more total details than truth tellers—a pattern opposite to fabrication-based deception. [002] 2020 Legal and Criminological PsychologyVerbal cues to deceit when lying through omitting information
Truth tellers reported more complications than lie tellers after Model Statement exposure, but no significant difference emerged for total details — an atypical finding suggesting omission lies may reveal different… [003] 2018Using the model statement to elicit verbal differences between truth tellers and liars: The benefit of examining core and peripheral details
After exposure to a model statement, liars reported significantly more peripheral details than truth tellers, while both groups provided similar amounts of core details. This core-peripheral distinction revealed deception cues…Explore all research.
Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.