Professional Examiners Trained to APA Standards
140+ Professional Testing Locations Across the U.S. & Canada
Trusted by 10,000+ Clients, Attorneys & Organizations
LieDetectorTest.com Private & Confidential Polygraph Provider

Home › Polygraph Research › Researchers › G. Bogaard

Researcher file

G. Bogaard

5 peer-reviewed polygraph studies — 2014–2020.

5Studies
2014–2020Active period
9Co-authors
1Research areas
5Journals

Researcher record

NameG. Bogaard
Publications5 peer-reviewed studies in this database
Active period2014–2020

Research methodology profile

Laboratory · 2 Meta-Analysis · 1 Survey · 1

Research areas

Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection 4

Co-author network

Researchers who have co-authored studies with G. Bogaard.

Publications [5]

All peer-reviewed studies by G. Bogaard in our database.

[001] 2020 Applied Cognitive Psychology

A model statement does not enhance the verifiability approach

Model statements did not enhance the discriminability of the verifiability approach, as both truth-tellers and liars similarly increased verifiable details without improving diagnostic value. Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory
[002] 2019 Legal and Criminological Psychology

Verify the scene, report the symptoms: Testing the Verifiability Approach and SRSI in the detection of fabricated PTSD claims

The Verifiability Approach achieved 79% accuracy with high specificity for identifying honest claimants, while SRSI achieved 76% accuracy with better sensitivity for detecting fabricators. Combined methods produced balanced 76% accuracy… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection
[003] 2016 Frontiers in Psychology

Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) cannot distinguish between truthful and fabricated accounts of a negative event

[004] 2016 PLoS ONE

Strong, but wrong: lay people's and police officers' beliefs about verbal and nonverbal cues to deception

Both police officers and lay people endorsed stereotypical but non-diagnostic nonverbal cues (gaze aversion, movement) as deception indicators, with no significant professional advantage. Beliefs about verbal cues from credibility assessment… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Meta-Analysis Survey
[005] 2014 Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling

Using an Example Statement Increases Information but Does Not Increase Accuracy of CBCA, RM, and SCAN

CBCA and RM showed discriminative validity between truth and lies, but SCAN did not. Providing a detailed example statement increased statement length but failed to enhance discrimination accuracy for any… Verbal & Behavioral Deception Detection Laboratory

Explore all research.

Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.

Need to book now? Our online booking system is open 24/7. Speak directly with our team about your test or booking.