Home › Polygraph Research › Researchers › Ewout H. Meijer
Researcher file
Ewout H. Meijer
Psychophysiological deception detection, polygraph testing, and the Concealed Information Test
Researcher record
About Ewout H. Meijer
Ewout H. Meijer is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University in the Netherlands, where he works in the Section of Forensic Psychology. He received his PhD in 2008 on his dissertation entitled 'Psychophysiology and the detection of deception: Promises and perils'. He has held additional affiliations as a Research Fellow at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (September 2011-September 2012) and as a Fellow at the Israel Institute for Advanced Studies (October 2021-June 2022). He is a strong advocate of direct replications to help strengthen the evidence base in psychology.
Meijer's research has made significant contributions to the scientific understanding of polygraph testing and deception detection. He conducted a landmark meta-analysis on the Concealed Information Test (CIT), examining four physiological measures—skin conductance response, respiration line length, heart rate changes, and P300 event-related potentials. His 2011 book, co-edited with Bruno Verschuere and Gershon Ben-Shakhar, established Memory Detection: Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test as a foundational text in the field. In a widely-cited 2016 review, he and colleagues examined deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures, offering conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty about the accuracy of such techniques. His work has critically discussed the rationale, accuracy and application of the Control Question Test, including its use in sex offender management.
With over 5,300 citations, Meijer is recognized as a leading voice in polygraph science. He has maintained a prolific collaborative relationship with Bruno Verschuere, Gershon Ben-Shakhar, Matthias Gamer, and Harald Merckelbach, producing numerous joint publications on both the Comparison Question Test and the Concealed Information Test. In a 2023 interview with The Intercept, he provided expert commentary on lie detection technologies, noting the persistent gap between physiological measurement accuracy and actual lie detection validity. His critical stance on the scientific validity of polygraph practice—particularly the Control Question Test—has positioned him as an important skeptical voice advocating for evidence-based approaches to credibility assessment.
Meijer's polygraph research connects to his broader work in forensic psychology, psychophysiology, and open science. His research extends beyond deception detection to include investigative interviewing, verbal lie detection, and the psychological mechanisms underlying truthful and deceptive behavior. As an Open Science Ambassador, he has promoted transparency and replication in psychological research, contributing to registered replication reports and advocating for rigorous methodological standards across the discipline.
Research methodology profile
Research areas
Co-author network
Researchers who have co-authored studies with Ewout H. Meijer.
Publications [20]
All peer-reviewed studies by Ewout H. Meijer in our database.
No evidence that instructions to ignore nonverbal cues improve deception detection accuracy
Instructions to ignore nonverbal cues produced no improvement in deception detection accuracy across three experiments. Participants continued to rely on visual information even when explicitly told not to, demonstrating that… [002] 2021 Psychiatry, Psychology, and LawA within-statement baseline comparison for detecting lies
Within-statement baseline comparisons did not improve lie detection accuracy, with performance remaining at chance levels regardless of whether participants received baseline instructions. [003] 2020 Applied Cognitive PsychologyA model statement does not enhance the verifiability approach
Model statements did not enhance the discriminability of the verifiability approach, as both truth-tellers and liars similarly increased verifiable details without improving diagnostic value. [004] 2019 PLOS ONELie prevalence, lie characteristics and strategies of self-reported good liars
Self-reported good liars tell more lies per day, with nearly 40% of all lies told by a few prolific liars. Good liars strategically embed lies into truthful information, keep statements… [005] 2017 Oxford Scholarship OnlineDetection Deception Using Psychophysiological and Neural Measures
[006] 2016 Frontiers in PsychologyScientific Content Analysis (SCAN) cannot distinguish between truthful and fabricated accounts of a negative event
[007] 2016 PsychophysiologyDeception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty
The review identified significant conceptual clarity issues and methodological problems across deception detection paradigms, particularly challenging the oversold promises of neuroimaging-based lie detection technologies. [008] 2016 PLoS ONEStrong, but wrong: lay people's and police officers' beliefs about verbal and nonverbal cues to deception
Both police officers and lay people endorsed stereotypical but non-diagnostic nonverbal cues (gaze aversion, movement) as deception indicators, with no significant professional advantage. Beliefs about verbal cues from credibility assessment… [009] 2015 PsycTESTS DatasetDeception Task--Adapted Version
Children with implanted false memories were faster to confirm than deny statements about false events, providing evidence that implanted false memories reflect actual memory traces rather than mere compliance. [010] 2015 In Granhag et al. (Eds.), Detecting DeceptionThe polygraph: Current practice and new approaches
The review highlighted ongoing debates about polygraph accuracy and identified the Concealed Information Test as a potentially more scientifically sound alternative to traditional Control Question Tests. [011] 2014 Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender ProfilingUsing an Example Statement Increases Information but Does Not Increase Accuracy of CBCA, RM, and SCAN
CBCA and RM showed discriminative validity between truth and lies, but SCAN did not. Providing a detailed example statement increased statement length but failed to enhance discrimination accuracy for any… [012] 2013 Cognitive NeurodynamicsA comment on Farwell (2012): brain fingerprinting: a comprehensive tutorial review of detection of concealed information with event-related brain potentials
Of the studies cited by Farwell to support brain fingerprinting's perfect accuracy, only one peer-reviewed laboratory study with 20 participants and two small field studies (4 and 6 participants) met… [013] 2011 • REVIEW BookMemory Detection: Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test (Book)
Comprehensive edited volume with contributions from leading CIT researchers worldwide. Covered theoretical foundations, laboratory research, field applications in Japan, countermeasures, and legal issues. [014] 2011 Consciousness and CognitionThe ease of lying
[015] 2011 Memory Detection: Theory and Application of the Concealed Information TestPractical guidelines for developing a CIT
Central crime details directly related to crime execution are recalled at 90.2% compared to only 65.9% for peripheral details. Guidelines emphasize selecting information present in perpetrator memory but unknown to… [016] 2010 The Open Criminology JournalDetecting Criminal Intent with the Concealed Information Test
[017] 2010 Journal of Forensic Psychology PracticeThe Polygraph and the Detection of Deception
The CQT detects deception better than chance but with significant error rates, contrasting sharply with industry claims of 98% accuracy. The CIT demonstrates superior validity with effect sizes around .82… [018] 2008 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31(5), 423–429Sex Offender Management Using the Polygraph: A Critical Review
Critical evaluation of PCSOT effectiveness. Acknowledged that PCSOT reliably elicits increased disclosures but questioned whether increased disclosure translates to reduced recidivism. Called the polygraph an effective “truth facilitator.” [019] 2008 Physiology & BehaviorThe Quadri-Track Zone Comparison Technique: it's just not science. A critique to Mangan, Armitage, and Adams (2008)
The critique identified fundamental methodological flaws including confession-based ground truth creating sampling bias, untested theoretical foundations (psychological set), bias against innocent examinees in scoring rules, and unsupported claims of countermeasure… [020] 0Psychophysiology and the detection of deception: promises and perils
The Comparison Question Test was found to have weak scientific validity that cannot be remedied by neuroimaging. Question format rather than measurement technology was identified as the primary determinant of…Explore all research.
Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.