Home › Polygraph Research › Researchers › Daniel D. Langleben
Researcher file
Daniel D. Langleben
Pioneer in fMRI-based lie detection and neuroimaging of deception
Researcher record
About Daniel D. Langleben
Daniel Langleben is an American psychiatrist and Associate Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania. He received his MD degree from Hadassah School of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1989 and completed postgraduate training in Psychiatry at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, followed by fellowships in Addiction Psychiatry at University of California, San Francisco (1995-1997) and Nuclear Medicine at Stanford University Medical Center (1997-1999). He is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Studies of Addiction.
Langleben pioneered a technique for using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as a means of lie detection. His interest in deception detection was inspired while studying children with Attention Deficit Disorder at Stanford University, where he found that these children have a more difficult time inhibiting the truth, leading him to postulate that lying requires increased brain activity compared to truth because the truth must be suppressed. His landmark 2002 study demonstrated brain activity patterns during simulated deception using event-related fMRI, while his 2005 work achieved 78% accuracy in discriminating lie from truth on a single-event level. His studies showed that the inferior and superior prefrontal and anterior cingulate gyri and the parietal cortex showed increased activity during deception. His 2016 study compared fMRI and polygraphy in a controlled blind comparison using the Concealed Information Test, finding that fMRI experts were 24% more likely to detect concealed information than polygraphy experts.
Langleben has been a central figure in debates about neuroimaging lie detection at the intersection of science, law, and policy. In 2002, he licensed his methods for lie detection to the No Lie MRI company, though he has also been among the first to elaborate comprehensive understanding of the new technologies' errors and potential societal risks and benefits. His frequent collaborators include Jonathan G. Hakun, Ruben C. Gur, Kosha Ruparel, and Warren B. Bilker from Penn, as well as legal scholar Jane Campbell Moriarty, with whom he co-authored influential policy analyses examining whether fMRI-based lie detection meets legal standards of reliability.
While best known for deception detection research, Langleben's broader work spans multiple domains within psychiatry and neuroscience. His research portfolio includes studies on addiction psychiatry, examining brain responses to drug cues in opioid-dependent patients treated with extended-release naltrexone, as well as investigations into the neural basis of advertising effectiveness and infant facial attractiveness. This interdisciplinary approach reflects his training in both psychiatry and neuroimaging, positioning his polygraph-related work within a larger program of research on behavioral control, inhibition, and brain-based credibility assessment.
Research methodology profile
Research areas
Co-author network
Researchers who have co-authored studies with Daniel D. Langleben.
Publications [8]
All peer-reviewed studies by Daniel D. Langleben in our database.
Review of fMRI Studies on Lie Detection (16 Studies)
Review of 16 empirical studies using fMRI for deception detection. Found that inconsistency between findings and absence of replications make fMRI not yet scientifically reliable for practical lie detection, supporting… [002] 2016 Journal of Clinical PsychiatryPolygraphy and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Lie Detection: A Controlled Blind Comparison Using the Concealed Information Test
fMRI experts were 24% more likely to detect concealed information than polygraph experts (RR=1.24, p<.001). When both modalities agreed on determinations, accuracy reached 100% across 17 cases. [003] 2013 • REVIEW Psychology, Public Policy, and LawUsing Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide
Reviewed 76–90% accuracy range under controlled conditions but noted substantial translational gaps between lab and forensic settings. Called for more robust research before courtroom use. [004] 2008 • NEUROSCIENCE & LAW American Journal of Bioethics, 5(2), 39–49Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie Detection: Promises and Perils
Examined ethical and legal implications of fMRI and other neuroscience-based lie detection. Discussed privacy rights, cognitive liberty, and potential for misuse in legal proceedings. [005] 2006 The Journal of Psychiatry & LawTrue Lies: Delusions and Lie-Detection Technology
The authors propose that delusions could lead to objectively false statements that are nevertheless subjectively true and indistinguishable from truth by traditional polygraph measures, but functional brain imaging might distinguish… [006] 2005 • INDIVIDUAL DETECTION Human Brain MappingTelling Truth from Lie in Individual Subjects with Fast Event-Related fMRI
First quantitative estimate of fMRI deception detection in individuals. Achieved 78% accuracy at single-event level and 85% AUC using receiver operating characteristic analysis. [007] 2005 American Journal of BioethicsEmerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils
The paper identified that measurement validity of neurotechnologies for lie detection remained largely unknown, laboratory paradigms failed to replicate real-world deception contexts, and the field lacked standardization with unknown vulnerability… [008] 2002 • FOUNDATIONAL fMRI NeuroImageBrain Activity During Simulated Deception: An Event-Related fMRI Study
First major fMRI deception study. Found increased anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activation during lying, establishing the neural basis for fMRI-based lie detection research.Explore all research.
Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.