Professional Examiners Trained to APA Standards
140+ Professional Testing Locations Across the U.S. & Canada
Trusted by 10,000+ Clients, Attorneys & Organizations
LieDetectorTest.com Private & Confidential Polygraph Provider

HomePolygraph ResearchResearchers › Daniel D. Langleben

Researcher file

Daniel D. Langleben

Pioneer in fMRI-based lie detection and neuroimaging of deception

8Studies
2002–2016Active period
13Co-authors
3Research areas
7Journals

Researcher record

NameDaniel D. Langleben
AffiliationUniversity of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of MedicineUnited States
Publications8 peer-reviewed studies in this database
Active period2002–2016
Research focusPioneer in fMRI-based lie detection and neuroimaging of deception

About Daniel D. Langleben

Daniel Langleben is an American psychiatrist and Associate Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania. He received his MD degree from Hadassah School of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem in 1989 and completed postgraduate training in Psychiatry at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, followed by fellowships in Addiction Psychiatry at University of California, San Francisco (1995-1997) and Nuclear Medicine at Stanford University Medical Center (1997-1999). He is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Studies of Addiction.

Langleben pioneered a technique for using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) as a means of lie detection. His interest in deception detection was inspired while studying children with Attention Deficit Disorder at Stanford University, where he found that these children have a more difficult time inhibiting the truth, leading him to postulate that lying requires increased brain activity compared to truth because the truth must be suppressed. His landmark 2002 study demonstrated brain activity patterns during simulated deception using event-related fMRI, while his 2005 work achieved 78% accuracy in discriminating lie from truth on a single-event level. His studies showed that the inferior and superior prefrontal and anterior cingulate gyri and the parietal cortex showed increased activity during deception. His 2016 study compared fMRI and polygraphy in a controlled blind comparison using the Concealed Information Test, finding that fMRI experts were 24% more likely to detect concealed information than polygraphy experts.

Langleben has been a central figure in debates about neuroimaging lie detection at the intersection of science, law, and policy. In 2002, he licensed his methods for lie detection to the No Lie MRI company, though he has also been among the first to elaborate comprehensive understanding of the new technologies' errors and potential societal risks and benefits. His frequent collaborators include Jonathan G. Hakun, Ruben C. Gur, Kosha Ruparel, and Warren B. Bilker from Penn, as well as legal scholar Jane Campbell Moriarty, with whom he co-authored influential policy analyses examining whether fMRI-based lie detection meets legal standards of reliability.

While best known for deception detection research, Langleben's broader work spans multiple domains within psychiatry and neuroscience. His research portfolio includes studies on addiction psychiatry, examining brain responses to drug cues in opioid-dependent patients treated with extended-release naltrexone, as well as investigations into the neural basis of advertising effectiveness and infant facial attractiveness. This interdisciplinary approach reflects his training in both psychiatry and neuroimaging, positioning his polygraph-related work within a larger program of research on behavioral control, inhibition, and brain-based credibility assessment.

Research methodology profile

Neuroimaging · 7

Research areas

Neuroimaging & New Technologies 6 Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews 1 Legal & Policy Studies 1

Co-author network

Researchers who have co-authored studies with Daniel D. Langleben.

Publications [8]

All peer-reviewed studies by Daniel D. Langleben in our database.

[001] 2016 Various Publications

Review of fMRI Studies on Lie Detection (16 Studies)

Review of 16 empirical studies using fMRI for deception detection. Found that inconsistency between findings and absence of replications make fMRI not yet scientifically reliable for practical lie detection, supporting… Meta-Analyses & Systematic Reviews Neuroimaging
[002] 2016 Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Polygraphy and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Lie Detection: A Controlled Blind Comparison Using the Concealed Information Test

fMRI experts were 24% more likely to detect concealed information than polygraph experts (RR=1.24, p<.001). When both modalities agreed on determinations, accuracy reached 100% across 17 cases. Neuroimaging & New Technologies Neuroimaging
[003] 2013 • REVIEW Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Using Brain Imaging for Lie Detection: Where Science, Law and Research Policy Collide

Reviewed 76–90% accuracy range under controlled conditions but noted substantial translational gaps between lab and forensic settings. Called for more robust research before courtroom use. Legal & Policy Studies Neuroimaging
[004] 2008 • NEUROSCIENCE & LAW American Journal of Bioethics, 5(2), 39–49

Emerging Neurotechnologies for Lie Detection: Promises and Perils

Examined ethical and legal implications of fMRI and other neuroscience-based lie detection. Discussed privacy rights, cognitive liberty, and potential for misuse in legal proceedings. Neuroimaging & New Technologies
[005] 2006 The Journal of Psychiatry & Law

True Lies: Delusions and Lie-Detection Technology

The authors propose that delusions could lead to objectively false statements that are nevertheless subjectively true and indistinguishable from truth by traditional polygraph measures, but functional brain imaging might distinguish… Neuroimaging & New Technologies Neuroimaging
[006] 2005 • INDIVIDUAL DETECTION Human Brain Mapping

Telling Truth from Lie in Individual Subjects with Fast Event-Related fMRI

First quantitative estimate of fMRI deception detection in individuals. Achieved 78% accuracy at single-event level and 85% AUC using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Neuroimaging & New Technologies Neuroimaging
[007] 2005 American Journal of Bioethics

Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils

The paper identified that measurement validity of neurotechnologies for lie detection remained largely unknown, laboratory paradigms failed to replicate real-world deception contexts, and the field lacked standardization with unknown vulnerability… Neuroimaging & New Technologies Neuroimaging
[008] 2002 • FOUNDATIONAL fMRI NeuroImage

Brain Activity During Simulated Deception: An Event-Related fMRI Study

First major fMRI deception study. Found increased anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activation during lying, establishing the neural basis for fMRI-based lie detection research. Neuroimaging & New Technologies Neuroimaging

Explore all research.

Browse our complete database of 3493 peer-reviewed polygraph studies.

Need to book now? Our online booking system is open 24/7. Speak directly with our team about your test or booking.