In the realm of polygraph testing, the importance of an examinee’s cooperation cannot be overstated. According to Raymond Nelson in an article for the APA Magazine 2018, effective behavioral cooperation during the test significantly enhances the likelihood of obtaining accurate and favorable outcomes. This article discusses the critical role of in-test instructions and admonitions in promoting such cooperation.
Table of Contents
The Role of In-Test Guidance
Despite thorough pre-test interviews, some examinees may still exhibit behaviors during the test that could potentially jeopardize the results. Whether due to a misunderstanding of the test’s significance or deliberate uncooperativeness, these behaviors necessitate additional guidance from the examiner. This in-test phase is crucial as it offers a last opportunity to correct any counterproductive behaviors before they impact the test results.
Strategies for Effective In-Test Instructions
- Clarification and Reinforcement: Examiners should provide clear, concise instructions that reinforce the importance of cooperation. This involves reminding the examinee of the behaviors required during the test, such as remaining still, not speaking, or maintaining a consistent breathing pattern.
- Non-Confrontational Approach: Instructions should be given in a manner that is authoritative yet non-accusatory. Accusations or confrontational tactics are likely to increase defensiveness and can exacerbate uncooperative behaviors.
- Handling Problematic Behaviors: When examinees display problematic behaviors, examiners should address these issues calmly and professionally. The approach should focus on helping the examinee understand what is expected rather than criticizing their behavior.
- Repetition and Consistency: If necessary, instructions can be repeated once to ensure understanding. However, the tone and intensity of the instructions should remain consistent, avoiding any escalation that could lead to further issues.
- Documentation: All in-test interactions, especially those involving additional instructions or admonitions, should be meticulously documented. This documentation is vital for analyzing the test process and outcomes.
Challenges and Considerations
The diversity in examinee behavior means that examiners must be prepared to adapt their strategies. Some examinees may attempt to manipulate the test results intentionally, while others might simply struggle to adhere to testing protocols due to nervousness or misunderstanding. Distinguishing between these motives is challenging and requires skilled judgment from the examiner.
In cases where behavioral issues persist despite repeated instructions, the examiner might need to consider pausing the test to discuss and rectify these issues further. However, terminating a test prematurely should be a last resort, used only when all other avenues for ensuring cooperation have been exhausted.
Conclusion
In-test instructions and admonitions are more than mere procedural formalities; they are integral to the integrity and success of polygraph examinations. By applying these strategies effectively, examiners can significantly enhance the accuracy of the results and maintain the professionalism and efficacy of the polygraph as a tool for truth verification. This approach ensures that both truthful and deceptive examinees are given a fair opportunity to demonstrate their honesty in a controlled and respectful testing environment.
